2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic identification of Sarda goats under extensive conditions in the island of Sardinia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thomas et al (2006) reported that the overall loss of e-ETs was 9.9 % for sheep in 4.5 months and 19.2 % for lambs in about 3 months, and these lost rates were unacceptably high for official use. Elec- tronic and visual ear tag losses observed in the study were lower than those reported in the literature (Caja et al, 1999;Conill et al, 2002;Rusk, 2002;Ghirardi et al, 2006;Thomas et al, 2006). …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thomas et al (2006) reported that the overall loss of e-ETs was 9.9 % for sheep in 4.5 months and 19.2 % for lambs in about 3 months, and these lost rates were unacceptably high for official use. Elec- tronic and visual ear tag losses observed in the study were lower than those reported in the literature (Caja et al, 1999;Conill et al, 2002;Rusk, 2002;Ghirardi et al, 2006;Thomas et al, 2006). …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Electronic identification considerably facilitates the implementation of traceability systems. Pinna et al (2006), who applied a questionnaire to technicians and farmers in order to determine the practical use of electronic identification systems, reported that there was satisfaction with and interest in the electronic identification system because the official animal identification systems currently used were not satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinna et al (2006) evaluated the retention rate of the ruminal bolus in adult goats and reported mean value of 99.6% after eight months of evaluation. Carné et al (2011) observed mean retention rate of 99.5% for ruminal bolus in goats after one year of evaluation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional identification systems of small ruminants like plastic ear tags, necklaces and tattoos are not reliable due to possibility of violation and loss of devices (Pinna et al, 2006). Ear tags are visual devices widely used but show high device loss rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation