2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00060-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic healthcare record; a way to empower the patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant investments have been made by organizations to offer PHRs based on the desire to enhance patient-centered care [7-11], and the perceived potential for health care system improvement [12,13]. Historically, most PHR implementation efforts have focused on broad conceptions of consumer empowerment in which advocates emphasize the potential for PHRs to (1) increase consumer access to and control over health information, and (2) enable active patient participation in health care decision making and health management [14,15]. Despite high consumer interest in PHRs [16-21] and growing availability [22-25], a paradox exists in that adoption remains relatively low overall [26-28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant investments have been made by organizations to offer PHRs based on the desire to enhance patient-centered care [7-11], and the perceived potential for health care system improvement [12,13]. Historically, most PHR implementation efforts have focused on broad conceptions of consumer empowerment in which advocates emphasize the potential for PHRs to (1) increase consumer access to and control over health information, and (2) enable active patient participation in health care decision making and health management [14,15]. Despite high consumer interest in PHRs [16-21] and growing availability [22-25], a paradox exists in that adoption remains relatively low overall [26-28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to guarantee a high level of quality with regard to the functions offered and the processes supported by EHRs, it seems Information offered should be accurate/unambiguous. [23,25,36,47,59,64,68,76,80,86,91,112] 3 N…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,31,33,47,49,68,84,90,116] 1 N Information offered should be complete and comprehensive. [23,25,36,47,59,80,86,117] 2 N Metainformation should be available for data [83,102] including when care took place [38,59], the clinical setting [59] and the qualification of the author [38,54,[83][84]. [38,54,59,[83][84]102] 4 N…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a “Home Telecare System” that integrates clinical signs monitoring, automated scheduling, and medication reminders, access to health education, and daily logs, can help patients self‐manage their chronic disease 40 . There are also a number of examples of systems that facilitate patient‐EHR interactions and studies have shown a benefit to having patients view their medical data 40–42 …”
Section: Issues In It Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%