Electronic Health Record Impact on Work Burden in Small, Unaffiliated, Community-Based Primary Care Practices

Abstract

BACKGROUND:The use of electronic health records (EHR) is widely recommended as a means to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of US healthcare. Relatively little is known, however, about how implementation and use of this technology affects the work of clinicians and support staff who provide primary health care in small, independent practices. OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of EHR use on clinician and staff work burden in small, communitybased primary care practices. DESIGN: We conducted in-depth field research in seven community-based primary care practices. A team of field researchers spent 9-14 days over a 4-8 week period observing work in each practice, following patients through the practices, conducting interviews with key informants, and collecting documents and photographs. Field research data were coded and analyzed by a multidisciplinary research team, using a grounded theory approach. PARTICIPANTS: All practice members and selected patients in seven community-based primary care practices in the Northeastern US. KEY RESULTS: The impact of EHR use on work burden differed for clinicians compared to support staff. EHR use reduced both clerical and clinical staff work burden by improving how they check in and room patients, how they chart their work, and how they communicate with both patients and providers. In contrast, EHR use reduced some clinician work (i.e., prescribing, some lab-related tasks, and communication within the office), while increasing other work (i.e., charting, chronic disease and preventive care tasks, and some lab-related tasks). Thoughtful implementation and strategic workflow redesign can mitigate the disproportionate EHRrelated work burden for clinicians, as well as facilitate population-based care. CONCLUSIONS: The complex needs of the primary care clinician should be understood and considered as the next iteration of EHR systems are developed and implemented.KEY WORDS: electronic health records; primary care; work burden; qualitative research.

A Time-Motion Study of Primary Care Physicians’ Work in the Electronic Health Record Era

“…1 Reviews of the effect of EHRs on patient and physician outcomes have been mixed, including neutral to small positive effects on common quality metrics and disease-specific guidelines, 2-5 mixed on office workflow, 2,6,7 and mostly decreased on primary care physician productivity. [8][9][10] There is little to no evidence that patient outcomes are improved or overall health care costs are reduced.…”

In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices

“…1 Time pressure, chaotic work environments, increasing administrative and regulatory demands, an expanding knowledge base, fragmentation of care delivery, and greater expectations placed on primary care contribute to the strain. 9 Workdays are getting longer 10 and rewards are diminishing. Joy is in short supply.…”

Incorporação de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação e qualidade na atenção básica em saúde no Brasil

“…A maioria dos provedores de cuidados primários concordou que o RES permitiu-lhes prestar cuidados de forma mais segura 8 . O potencial para melhorar a qualidade e a segurança deve-se ao aumento da adesão aos cuidados baseados em orientação, documentação mais completa e ganhos de eficiência 9 . Um sistema de coordenação dos cuidados, utilizado na atenção primária, com um protocolo baseado em hematúria, diminuiu o tempo para completar uma avaliação, reduzindo o número de visitas totais necessárias para fazer um diagnóstico final 10 .…”