2020
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Fetal Monitoring–Prevention or Rescue?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to highlight that so far fHR monitoring has not been enough to prevent fetal injury during labor and, consequently, long-term complications. In fact, the role of fHR monitoring (electronic fetal monitoring, EFM, to be precise), despite being used in over 90% of hospitals during delivery, remains controversial (Schifrin, 2020 ). There is no clarity on its usefulness in decreasing perinatal mortality or cerebral palsy when measured by a CTG which has been explained by the incorrect focus of EFM on prediction of acidemia, a poor correlate to fetal injury, instead of predicting fetal cardiovascular decompensation per se as well as the limitations of CTG technologies in capturing the short-term time scale fluctuations of HRV reflecting vagal modulations (Alfirevic et al, 2017 ; Frasch et al, 2017 ; Frasch, 2018 ; Gold and Frasch, 2021 ).…”
Section: The Environmental Factors Affecting the Ans Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to highlight that so far fHR monitoring has not been enough to prevent fetal injury during labor and, consequently, long-term complications. In fact, the role of fHR monitoring (electronic fetal monitoring, EFM, to be precise), despite being used in over 90% of hospitals during delivery, remains controversial (Schifrin, 2020 ). There is no clarity on its usefulness in decreasing perinatal mortality or cerebral palsy when measured by a CTG which has been explained by the incorrect focus of EFM on prediction of acidemia, a poor correlate to fetal injury, instead of predicting fetal cardiovascular decompensation per se as well as the limitations of CTG technologies in capturing the short-term time scale fluctuations of HRV reflecting vagal modulations (Alfirevic et al, 2017 ; Frasch et al, 2017 ; Frasch, 2018 ; Gold and Frasch, 2021 ).…”
Section: The Environmental Factors Affecting the Ans Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevailing focus on fetal acidemia as the primary indicator of fetal distress has been challenged, suggesting the need for a more expansive understanding of fetal-maternal physiology and advocating for a less defensive posture towards monitoring. Additionally, the persistent concern of obstetrical malpractice, often centered around the interpretation of EFM tracings, introduces a further layer of complexity to this issue [4].…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%