1980
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2220980140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Excitations in Some Transition Metals and Their Oxides. Characteristic Energy Loss Measurements up to 50 eV

Abstract: The characteristic energy losses suffered b y a 20 keV electron beam through thin films of some transition metals (Sc, Y, Zr, Hf) and of their oxides are measured using a magnetic spectrograph u p t o 50 eV. The energy loss function -1m 1/& and the complex diclectric constant are calculated. It is shown that the electron excitation spectra of metals contain two main contributions in this energy range: one due t o collective excitations of the conduction electrons, the other t o the excitation of inner p-electr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(16 reference statements)
6
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These literature values are added to Table II. Because of the lack of experimental data in the literature for the orthorhombic HfO 2 phase, we restrict the comparison of our results to the data obtained for the monoclinic phase. In this case we find good agreement between our band gap value ͑5.3± 0.5 eV͒ and the experimental EELS band gap values determined by Yu et al 30 ͑E g = 5.25 eV͒ and by Frandon et al 29 ͑5.5± 0.2 eV͒. On the contrary, in comparison to the UV spectroscopy result ͑E g = 5.68 eV͒ of Balog et al, 31 our band gap is about 0.4 eV smaller.…”
Section: Band Gapsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These literature values are added to Table II. Because of the lack of experimental data in the literature for the orthorhombic HfO 2 phase, we restrict the comparison of our results to the data obtained for the monoclinic phase. In this case we find good agreement between our band gap value ͑5.3± 0.5 eV͒ and the experimental EELS band gap values determined by Yu et al 30 ͑E g = 5.25 eV͒ and by Frandon et al 29 ͑5.5± 0.2 eV͒. On the contrary, in comparison to the UV spectroscopy result ͑E g = 5.68 eV͒ of Balog et al, 31 our band gap is about 0.4 eV smaller.…”
Section: Band Gapsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…38 In the present study, up to 7 Mermin-type ELFs were necessary in order to fit the excitation spectrum for HfO 2 . 39,40 The experimental ELF for LaScO 3 was obtained from optical experiments of reflectivity 41 using a Kramers-Kronig analysis, and up to 10 Mermin-type ELFs were used in the fitting. The wake forces between fragments, which are the main responsible for the vicinage effects in the energy loss, are also implemented in the code using the dielectric formalism and the same method to account for the ELF.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-loss energy loss features (< 30 eV) have been investigated by several authors for the chemically and structurally similar ZrO 2 [14][15][16][17][18]. Peak A corresponded to the energy of the optical band gap (~ 5.6 -5.8 eV [19,20]), whereas feature at higher energy losses (peaks E-H)…”
Section: (B) ~ 19 (C) ~ 266 (D) 3(e) ~ 37 (F) ~ 42 (G) and ~ 4mentioning
confidence: 99%