1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(77)90231-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic energy band parameters of graphite and their dependence on pressure, temperature and acceptor concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A commonly used value for the decay constant is α s = 3.37, which agrees with predictions of the next nearest-neighbor hopping parameter and fits experimental results for dγ 0 (r)/dr [42]. The intralayer hopping parameter for the top layer becomes…”
Section: Triaxial Strainsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A commonly used value for the decay constant is α s = 3.37, which agrees with predictions of the next nearest-neighbor hopping parameter and fits experimental results for dγ 0 (r)/dr [42]. The intralayer hopping parameter for the top layer becomes…”
Section: Triaxial Strainsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The richness of possible stacking configurations is due to the weak van der Waals forces that keep the layers together. Furthermore, the electronic structure of the conduction band in graphene and bulk graphite is well described by a tight binding model which includes hopping between the π orbitals in Carbon atoms, neglecting the remaining atomic orbitals which give rise to the σ bands in graphite 11,15,16,17,18,19,20 . It is known that the low energy electronic structure depends on the stacking order in bulk samples 21,22,23,24,25,26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, in bulk graphite one usually finds two types of holes and only one type of electrons with m e h Ϸ 0.056m 0 , m h h Ϸ 0.084m 0 or Ϸ0.04m 0 and m h l Ϸ 0.003m 0 . 15,21,22 Theory expects heavy carriers to have g = 2, whereas the location and degeneracy of minority holes are uncertain even for bulk graphite, being sensitive to, e.g., minor changes in the interlayer spacing. The existence of two electron carriers ͑one with g =4͒ and two types of relatively heavy holes clearly distinguish between bulk and surface carriers in graphite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%