2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0dt01943g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic effect of a perfluorinated β-diketiminate ligand on the bonding nature of copper carbonyl complexes

Abstract:

A combined experimental and computational study demonstrates the influence of fluorine substituents on the electronic properties of β-diketiminate ligands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 H NMR spectra of the heteroleptic β ‐diketiminate zinc ethyl complexes 16 Fnac 2 ZnEt [ 19a ] and 17 Fnac 2 ZnEt ( 1 ) show virtually identical shifts for the methylene ( 16 Fnac 2 ZnEt δ 0.10; 1 δ 0.12) and methyl protons ( 16 Fnac 2 ZnEt δ 0.76; 1 δ 0.77), as is also observed for the methyl groups ( δ –0.91) of the heteroleptic aluminum complexes 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 [ 19a ] and 17 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 ( 2 ). In contrast, the 13 C NMR resonances of the methyl groups in the aluminum complexes ( 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 δ –12.7; 2 δ –14.0) slightly differ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The 1 H NMR spectra of the heteroleptic β ‐diketiminate zinc ethyl complexes 16 Fnac 2 ZnEt [ 19a ] and 17 Fnac 2 ZnEt ( 1 ) show virtually identical shifts for the methylene ( 16 Fnac 2 ZnEt δ 0.10; 1 δ 0.12) and methyl protons ( 16 Fnac 2 ZnEt δ 0.76; 1 δ 0.77), as is also observed for the methyl groups ( δ –0.91) of the heteroleptic aluminum complexes 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 [ 19a ] and 17 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 ( 2 ). In contrast, the 13 C NMR resonances of the methyl groups in the aluminum complexes ( 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 δ –12.7; 2 δ –14.0) slightly differ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 17 Fnac 2 ligands in complexes 1 and 2 show almost planar configurations of the C 3 N 2 M unit with the C 6 F 5 rings standing perpendicular to the ligand core as was previously observed for the corresponding 16 Fnac 2 ‐substituted complexes 16 Fnac 2 ZnEt and 16 Fnac 2 AlMe 2 , respectively. [ 19a ] The zinc atom in complex 1 adopts a trigonal planar coordination geometry with a minor deviation (0.046 Å) from planarity, whereas the aluminum atom in complex 2 is tetrahedrally coordinated. The Zn–C bond [1.940(2) Å] is slightly shorter than those reported for Dippnac 2 ZnEt [1.971(4) Å] [ 21 ] and 6 Fnac 2 ZnEt { 6 Fnac 2 = HC[C(CF 3 )N‐2,6‐ i Pr 2 –C 6 H 3 ]} [1.963(17) Å] [ 22 ] but comparable to that observed in 16 Fnac 2 ZnEt [1.9449(12) Å].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations