Electronic diary assessment of pain, disability and psychological adaptation in patients differing in duration of pain

Abstract

Computerized diary measurement of pain, disability and psychological adaptation was performed four times a day for 4 weeks in 80 patients with various duration of unexplained pain. Reported are (1) the temporal characteristics and stability of pain report during the 4-week measurement period, (2) the association between pain duration and pain report, disability and general psychopathology, and (3) the accordance between diary assessment versus questionnaire assessment of pain, disability and psychological adaptation. No evidence of instrument reactivity was found: pain report was stable across the 4-week period. However, pain report appeared to be highly variable both between and within days. About half the patients showed a clear increasing trend in pain during the day. Several differences were found between subgroups of patients varying in pain duration. Patients with less than 6 months of pain reported signi®cantly less pain intensity, disability and fatigue than patients whose pain persisted for more than 6 months. Pain coping and responses to pain behaviors by the spouse also differed for the subgroups: longer pain duration was associated with increased catastrophizing and solicitous responses from the spouse.Comparison of scores obtained with diary versus questionnaire assessment indicated moderate correlations for most variables. Retrospective (questionnaire) assessment of pain intensity yielded signi®cantly higher pain scores than diary assessment. q 2000 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

The Treatment of Fear of Movement/(Re)injury in Chronic Low Back Pain: Further Evidence on the Effectiveness of Exposure In Vivo

“…Fortunately, process-oriented research is now receiving much more attention. 55,56 What can be said about the generalizability of the results to patients other than those included in the single-case experimental design? Although within single-case demonstrations with one or a few subjects it is, by definition, not possible to assess generality across subjects, a few comments are pertinent here.…”

Industrial location, spatial discrete choice models and the need to account for neighbourhood effects

“…This method allows for the repeated assessment of individuals' experiences in their natural Daily Flow Patterns 11 environment (Massimini, Csikszentmihalyi, & Carli, 1987;Christensen, Barrett, BlissMoreau, Lebo, & Kaschub, 2003) and for the assessment of within-person fluctuations in these experiences (Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003). In addition, this technique avoids the retrospection bias produced by questionnaires that are responded to at the end of the day or the week, because these require a remembering and cognitive integration of past experiences (Peters et al, 2000;Stone, Broderick, Shiffman, & Schwartz, 2004). In addition to accuracy and ecological validity, ESM provides the unique opportunity to acquire diurnal patterns of the flow experience.…”

Incorporating Biopsychosocial Characteristics into Personalized Healthcare: A Clinical Approach

“…Early detection and modification of psychological risk and resilience factors is more likely to have long-term benefits and to decrease unfavorable long-term outcomes of somatic conditions, particularly if the treatment prevents irreversible long-term consequences such as joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, patients are thought to develop a relatively stable strategy for coping with somatic conditions, and thus dysfunctional psychological factors may be less established and easier to modify at an earlier stage of the disease than later on [44,45]. Studies of risk and resilience factors in various conditions have shown that these factors can be detected early, at the time of diagnosis, and that the most relevant risk and resilience factors have comparable relationships to outcomes regardless of disease stage [39,46].…”