2004
DOI: 10.1097/00041433-200406000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronegative low-density lipoprotein

Abstract: Recent findings suggest that LDL(-) could contribute to atherogenesis via several mechanisms, including proinflammatory, proapoptotic and anti-angiogenesis properties. Further studies are required to define the role of LDL(-) in atherogenesis more precisely and to clarify mechanisms involved in endothelial cell activation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
53
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…LDL derived from atherosclerotic plaques is probably the most physiologically relevant LDL, but is limited in availability. FH-L5, isolated from circulation without artificial modification, has proven to be atherogenic and is easier to obtain than a-LDL (Chen et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2003;Sanchez-Quesada et al, 2004). Recently, much research has focused on its biological functions Yang et al, 2003;Benitez et al, 2004;Tai et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LDL derived from atherosclerotic plaques is probably the most physiologically relevant LDL, but is limited in availability. FH-L5, isolated from circulation without artificial modification, has proven to be atherogenic and is easier to obtain than a-LDL (Chen et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2003;Sanchez-Quesada et al, 2004). Recently, much research has focused on its biological functions Yang et al, 2003;Benitez et al, 2004;Tai et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avogaro and colleagues [8] were the first to report that LDL could be divided into electropositive [LDL (+)] and electronegative [LDL (–)] fractions by using ion-exchange chromatography. Since then, others have described the chemical and functional properties of these dichotomized LDL subfractions [9][12]. The proportion of plasma LDL(–) has been shown to be increased in patients with high cardiovascular risks [13] such as hyperlipidemia, diabetes, severe renal disease, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, as well as in patients with coronary syndromes when compared with healthy individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, L5 is not internalized by the normal LDL receptor but by the lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor- 1 (LOX-1), which in turn leads to endothelial cell apoptosis [20]. Circulating L5 has been shown to be pro-atherogenic [9] and is the only subfraction of human LDL that induces endothelial dysfunction and atherogenic responses in cultured vascular cells [14], [15], [21]. Although L5 has a role in promoting atherogenesis, it remains unknown whether L5 levels increase with the progression of CVD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making use of this characteristic, an electronegative modified LDL subfraction (LDL[−]) can be isolated from human plasma by anion exchange chromatography [8]. LDL(−) exhibits a variety of atherogenic and inflammatory properties [9], including abnormal density distribution [10], impaired affinity for the LDL receptor [8,11], cytotoxicity [12,13], apoptosis [14] and induction of inflammatory molecules production in cultured endothelial cells, such as interleukin-8 (IL-8), monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP-1) [15,16] and TNF-α-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) [17]. Moreover, the proportion of LDL(−) is increased in diseases with high cardiovascular risk such as familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) [11,18], hypertriglyceridaemia [10], renal failure disease [19] and type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group previously reported that optimisation of glycaemic control with intensive insulin therapy decreases the proportion of LDL (−) in subjects with type 1 diabetes [20,21], which led us to hypothesise that non-enzymatic glycosylation could be involved in the generation of LDL(−) in these patients. Although extensive characterisation of LDL(−) from normolipaemic and FH subjects has been reported [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], no data exist on the physicochemical characteristics of LDL (−) from diabetic subjects. Thus, the aim of the current work was to ascertain whether non-enzymatic glycosylation of LDL could directly induce the formation of LDL(−), thereby causing an increased proportion of LDL(−) in type 1 diabetic patients, and to determine the physicochemical and biological characteristics of LDL(−) isolated from these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%