2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta01132f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron trapping induced electrostatic adsorption of cations: a general factor leading to photoactivity decay of nanostructured TiO2

Abstract: In most photoactive semiconductors photochemical corrosion, which leads to photoactivity decay, is one of the bottleneck problems for their realistic application. Herein, we will disclose that electron trapping induced proton uptake is a general factor leading to photoactivity decay of nanostructured TiO 2 which is known for its exceptionally high photochemical stability. By using both phenolphthalein and phosphate group with covalent P-O-Ti connections as molecular probes and application of combined electroch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a −0.8 V bias was applied, sharp increase of dye adsorption amount was observed, especially in p‐TiO 2 electrodes. Similar results has been observed and attributed to surface‐defect related electron trapping in several reports [30,39] . The adsorption amount of p‐TiO 2 was about two times that of c‐TiO 2 , which was in consistent with the CV measurement results that the defect states in p‐TiO 2 NRAs was apparently higher than that of c‐TiO 2 NRAs, and also implying that electron transport would be more severely influenced in p‐TiO 2 than in c‐TiO 2 NRAs through the electron trapping induced electrostatic adsorption mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When a −0.8 V bias was applied, sharp increase of dye adsorption amount was observed, especially in p‐TiO 2 electrodes. Similar results has been observed and attributed to surface‐defect related electron trapping in several reports [30,39] . The adsorption amount of p‐TiO 2 was about two times that of c‐TiO 2 , which was in consistent with the CV measurement results that the defect states in p‐TiO 2 NRAs was apparently higher than that of c‐TiO 2 NRAs, and also implying that electron transport would be more severely influenced in p‐TiO 2 than in c‐TiO 2 NRAs through the electron trapping induced electrostatic adsorption mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Both p‐TiO 2 and c‐TiO 2 NRAs exhibited photocurrent spike and attenuation during six cycles of measurements. This phenomenon was reported and ascribed to electron trapping induced electrostatic adsorption in our previous reports [30] . More interestingly, significant increase (∼20 fold) of photocurrent was observed in c‐TiO 2 NRAs, compared to that of p‐TiO 2 NRAs, indicating an improvement of photoelectrochemical property.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…45,46 We attribute the slow growth of E3 in water-poor media to a steady increase of the local proton concentration at the electrode-solution interface upon cycling (as previously observed for metal oxides), which favours the PCET mechanism and further allows for the observed cycle-dependent behaviour in Supplementary Figure 17. 47,48 This hypothesis is supported by the disappearance of wave E3 upon restoring the electrode to its initial state by allowing equilibration at open-circuit conditions (Figure 5a). As such, in such a water-poor medium, we attribute the origin of the oxidation wave of C seen in the first scan to the protonation of…”
Section: Mechanistic Studies Of Immobilised Cotpypmentioning
confidence: 77%