1970
DOI: 10.1002/9780470166130.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Transfer Spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure A shows the DR UV–vis spectra of activated δ-Al 2 O 3–600 (spectrum 1), the δ-Al 2 O 3–600 /TiCl 4 precatalyst (spectrum 2), and the two catalysts (spectra 3a and 3b, respectively). The DR UV–vis spectrum of δ-Al 2 O 3–600 /TiCl 4 (spectrum 2) is dominated by three intense bands at approximately 42000, 35000, and 28000 cm –1 , which were previously assigned to ligand (either Cl or O) to metal (either 6- or 4-fold Ti 4+ sites) charge transfer transitions, as follows: Cl → Ti 4+ 6c at 28000 cm –1 , Cl → Ti 4+ 4c and O → Ti 4+ 6c at 35000 cm –1 , and O → Ti 4+ 4c at 42000 cm –1 . A color change is observed upon activation. The δ-Al 2 O 3–600 /TiCl 4 /H 2–400 catalyst was light blue, while the δ-Al 2 O 3–600 /TiCl 4 /TEA catalyst was dark brownish, a clear indication that the reduced Ti sites experience a different local environment in the two cases.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Figure A shows the DR UV–vis spectra of activated δ-Al 2 O 3–600 (spectrum 1), the δ-Al 2 O 3–600 /TiCl 4 precatalyst (spectrum 2), and the two catalysts (spectra 3a and 3b, respectively). The DR UV–vis spectrum of δ-Al 2 O 3–600 /TiCl 4 (spectrum 2) is dominated by three intense bands at approximately 42000, 35000, and 28000 cm –1 , which were previously assigned to ligand (either Cl or O) to metal (either 6- or 4-fold Ti 4+ sites) charge transfer transitions, as follows: Cl → Ti 4+ 6c at 28000 cm –1 , Cl → Ti 4+ 4c and O → Ti 4+ 6c at 35000 cm –1 , and O → Ti 4+ 4c at 42000 cm –1 . A color change is observed upon activation. The δ-Al 2 O 3–600 /TiCl 4 /H 2–400 catalyst was light blue, while the δ-Al 2 O 3–600 /TiCl 4 /TEA catalyst was dark brownish, a clear indication that the reduced Ti sites experience a different local environment in the two cases.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Since many contributions overlap to each other at high energy and hence cannot be clearly identified, the analysis will focus on the absorption band at lower energy, which is more easily identifiable and straightforwardly assigned to a Cl(π) → Ti(d) CT transition. 84,85 Moreover, on this band, the Jorgensen semiempirical rule on the optical electronegativity of transition metals and their ligands can be applied. 86 The spectrum of A shows the maximum of the first absorption at ca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the spectrum of Mg­(OEt) 2 displays no absorption in the whole UV–vis region, the spectra of the extracted samples are dominated by intense absorptions above 30000 cm –1 due to several charge-transfer (CT) transitions involving the Ti metal centers and their ligands. Since many contributions overlap to each other at high energy and hence cannot be clearly identified, the analysis will focus on the absorption band at lower energy, which is more easily identifiable and straightforwardly assigned to a Cl­(π) → Ti­(d) CT transition. , Moreover, on this band, the Jorgensen semi-empirical rule on the optical electronegativity of transition metals and their ligands can be applied…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this view, interactions involving the four equatorial nitrogen and two axial carbon donor centers effectively determine the d-orbital splitting. Charge transfer could involve promotion of an electron into a dσ or a dπ orbital; however, introducing another electron into one of the dπ orbitals would require electron pairing, so injection of an electron into an empty dσ level is likely to be a lower energy process . Whether to the a 1g d z 2 or b 1g d x 2 – y 2 orbital, the excitation originates from one of two degenerate e u (L) orbitals, which are C–C bonding.…”
Section: Ligand To Metal Charge Transfer Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge transfer could involve promotion of an electron into a dσ or a dπ orbital; however, introducing another electron into one of the dπ orbitals would require electron pairing, so injection of an electron into an empty dσ level is likely to be a lower energy process. 17 Whether to the a 1g d z 2 or b 1g d x 2 −y 2 orbital, the excitation originates from one of two degenerate e u (L) orbitals, which are C−C bonding. The excited state is therefore orbitally degenerate, and the full term symbol for the excited state is 4 E u .…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%