1990
DOI: 10.1021/ja00159a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-transfer self-exchange kinetics of cytochrome b5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
58
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
15
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are similar to those obtained for the cytochrome c adsorbed on the same SAM [1,58,61] and result to be lower than those for freely diffusing cupredoxins [63][64][65]. A similar effect of protein immobilization on k has been found for cytochrome c [21,[60][61][62] for which the reorganization energy is remarkably affected by the nature of the SAM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…They are similar to those obtained for the cytochrome c adsorbed on the same SAM [1,58,61] and result to be lower than those for freely diffusing cupredoxins [63][64][65]. A similar effect of protein immobilization on k has been found for cytochrome c [21,[60][61][62] for which the reorganization energy is remarkably affected by the nature of the SAM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The calculated values for the inner-sphere reorganization energy lie between 16 and 37 kcal/mol, which is in good agreement with what was measured for the selfexchange reorganization energy of cytochrome c [90]. The calculated values suggest adiabatic barriers ranging from an effectively barrierless reaction (CH2 ?…”
Section: Kinetic Barrier Calculationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Given the absence of Coulombic repulsion the k ese of A. variabilis PCu can be considered to be representative of the maximum in vitro value attainable within this family. These results are consistent with previous ESE studies on redox metalloproteins (8,22,34,36,(47)(48)(49) (Table I). Hydrophobic interactions are favored at high I and the small k ese (and k inf ) for D. crassirhizoma PCu can be partly explained by the less hydrophobic binding site in this protein (Fig.…”
Section: Ionic Strength Dependence Of the Ese Rate Constant-thesupporting
confidence: 93%