Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1999
DOI: 10.1021/la981452g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-Transfer Reactions in SDS Micelles:  Reactivity of Pyrene and Tris(2,2‘-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) Excited States Investigated by Time-Resolved Luminescence Quenching

Abstract: The effects of micellization on the rate constants and Gibbs energy of electron transfer (ΔG et) are studied by time-resolved luminescence quenching of tris(2,2‘-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) (RUBIPY) and pyrene (PY) by electron acceptors and donors in sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) micelles. For RUBIPY, which is bound to the SDS micelles and accessible to water, ΔG et is considerably smaller than what is found in organic solutions, though the spectral properties of RUBIPY and the value of diffusion-controlled quenchin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimal effect is in line with literature data for electron-transfer reactions between excited SDS-bound ruthenium tris(2,2′-bipyridyl) and a series of micelle-solubilized quenchers for which the rate constants and energetics are similar to those in aqueous solution. 6 By contrast, electron-transfer quenching of the excited state of an aqueous ruthenium complex by diheptyl viologen bound to SDS micelles is over an order of magnitude slower than the same reaction in aqueous solution. 7 The present results indicate that radical cations provide excellent probes for studying electron-transfer reactivity in anionic micelles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimal effect is in line with literature data for electron-transfer reactions between excited SDS-bound ruthenium tris(2,2′-bipyridyl) and a series of micelle-solubilized quenchers for which the rate constants and energetics are similar to those in aqueous solution. 6 By contrast, electron-transfer quenching of the excited state of an aqueous ruthenium complex by diheptyl viologen bound to SDS micelles is over an order of magnitude slower than the same reaction in aqueous solution. 7 The present results indicate that radical cations provide excellent probes for studying electron-transfer reactivity in anionic micelles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 -50 Comparing the values inside micelles 18,40,90 and in bulk acetonitrile solution, 92 one can expect that the k d values in the former can be only of the order of ϳ5ϫ10 8 dm 3 mol Ϫ1 s Ϫ1 ͑assuming ϳ10 cP), much lower than the maximum k q values observed for the present systems. In fact, in the work of Soboleva et al, 93 a k d value for SDS micellar solution is estimated to be ϳ3 ϫ10 8 dm 3 mol Ϫ1 s Ϫ1 . Present results thus indicate that the mutual diffusion of the reactants might not play any significant role in determining the quenching kinetics for the present systems.…”
Section: Correlation Of the Quenching Constants With The Free-enermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several accounts regarding the physical nature and excited‐state dynamics of [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ in premicellar (12) and micellar (17–24) SDS. In aqueous solution, equimolar mixtures of [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ and SDS precipitate, presumably as the [Ru(bpy) 3 ] dodecyl sulfate salt (23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%