There are reports that nano-sized zero-valent iron (Fe0)
exhibits greater reactivity than micro-sized particles of
Fe0, and it has been suggested that the higher reactivity
of nano-Fe0 may impart advantages for groundwater
remediation or other environmental applications. However,
most of these reports are preliminary in that they leave
a host of potentially significant (and often challenging) material
or process variables either uncontrolled or unresolved.
In an effort to better understand the reactivity of nano-Fe0, we have used a variety of complementary techniques
to characterize two widely studied nano-Fe0 preparations:
one synthesized by reduction of goethite with heat and H2
(FeH2) and the other by reductive precipitation with
borohydride (FeBH). FeH2 is a two-phase material consisting
of 40 nm α-Fe0 (made up of crystals approximately the
size of the particles) and Fe3O4 particles of similar size or
larger containing reduced sulfur; whereas FeBH is mostly
20−80 nm metallic Fe particles (aggregates of <1.5 nm grains)
with an oxide shell/coating that is high in oxidized
boron. The FeBH particles further aggregate into chains.
Both materials exhibit corrosion potentials that are more
negative than nano-sized Fe2O3, Fe3O4, micro-sized Fe0, or a
solid Fe0 disk, which is consistent with their rapid reduction
of oxygen, benzoquinone, and carbon tetrachloride.
Benzoquinonewhich presumably probes inner-sphere
surface reactionsreacts more rapidly with FeBH than FeH2,
whereas carbon tetrachloride reacts at similar rates
with FeBH and FeH2, presumably by outer-sphere electron
transfer. Both types of nano-Fe0 react more rapidly than micro-sized Fe0 based on mass-normalized rate constants, but
surface area-normalized rate constants do not show a
significant nano-size effect. The distribution of products
from reduction of carbon tetrachloride is more favorable with
FeH2, which produces less chloroform than reaction with
FeBH.