2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5021893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron thermal confinement in a partially stochastic magnetic structure

Abstract: Using a high-repetition-rate Thomson scattering diagnostic, we observe a peak in electron temperature T e coinciding with the location of a large magnetic island in the Madison Symmetric Torus. Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of this quasi-single helicity plasma indicates that smaller adjacent islands overlap with and destroy the large island flux surfaces. The estimated stochastic electron thermal conductivity (%30 m 2 =s) is consistent with the conductivity inferred from the observed T e gradient and ohmic heat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the difference in thermal conductivity χ e does exist between fully and partially developed stochastic fields. For example, the measured χ e reaches ∼900 m 2 s −1 in a fully stochastic RFP field [34], but is an order-of-magnitude smaller in the partial stochastic field [35]. When the stochastic field partially heals in the core, a higher landing temperature T e,l than the usual T e,l [6] determined by the balance between P Ohm and P rad during the CQ is observed, as shown in figure 7(b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the difference in thermal conductivity χ e does exist between fully and partially developed stochastic fields. For example, the measured χ e reaches ∼900 m 2 s −1 in a fully stochastic RFP field [34], but is an order-of-magnitude smaller in the partial stochastic field [35]. When the stochastic field partially heals in the core, a higher landing temperature T e,l than the usual T e,l [6] determined by the balance between P Ohm and P rad during the CQ is observed, as shown in figure 7(b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%