“…As for the electronic structure of cis ‐ 5 •+ , the a values calculated for the methyl protons a Me,avg = +20.2 G (vs. 20.5 G, deduced from EPR) and the tertiary protons, a tert = –11.0 G (vs. 10.8 G, deduced from EPR), respectively, are in good agreement with the EPR experimentally derived splittings . On the other hand, a substantial discrepancy is observed for the geminal protons: the calculations for these geometrically nonequivalent protons indicate significantly different spin populations for the protons cis and trans, respectively, relative to the two methyl groups, viz ., a trans = +30.4 G, a cis = +10.6 G; yet the simulation of the experimental EPR spectrum was achieved with identical hfcs ( a gem = 20.5 G; a value close to the average of calculated a 3cis and a 3trans ). We note that the different a values calculated for H 3cis and H 3trans cannot be rooted in a dissymmetrical distribution of the unpaired spin density between the tertiary carbons: C 1 and C 2 have identical spin densities (ρ 1,2 = 0.485).…”