2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.88.041403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron shakeoff following theβ+decay of trapped35Ar+ions

Abstract: The electron shakeoff of 35 Cl atoms resulting from the β + decay of 35 Ar + ions has been investigated using a Paul trap coupled to a recoil-ion spectrometer. The charge-state distribution of the recoiling daughter nuclei is compared to theoretical calculations accounting for shakeoff and Auger processes. The calculations are in excellent agreement with the experimental results and enable to identify the ionization reaction routes leading to the formation of all charge states.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very interesting byproduct of these measurements with LPCTrap is related to the charge state distributions extracted for the recoiling 6 Li, 19 F and 35 Cl daughter nuclei [181,182,325,326]. For 6 Li the experimental shake-off probability was found to be in perfect agreement with simple quantum mechanical calculations [325].…”
Section: β − ν Correlationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A very interesting byproduct of these measurements with LPCTrap is related to the charge state distributions extracted for the recoiling 6 Li, 19 F and 35 Cl daughter nuclei [181,182,325,326]. For 6 Li the experimental shake-off probability was found to be in perfect agreement with simple quantum mechanical calculations [325].…”
Section: β − ν Correlationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The description of shake-off has seen significant theoretical (Carlson et al, 1968;Freedman, 1974;Frolov and Ruiz, 2010;Green, 1957;Law and Suzuki, 1982;Levinger, 1953;Ruiz, 2013;Ruiz et al, 2013;Schwartz, 1953;Stephas andCrasemann, 1967, 1971;Suzuki and Jaw, 1982) and experimental (Carlson, 1963a,b;Carlson et al, 1963;Couratin et al, 2013Couratin et al, , 2012Schupp and Freedman, 1980;Scielzo et al, 2003;Snell and Pleasonton, 1957) effort. For practical reasons, this has mainly focused on the calculation of electron ejection from the K shell, which is a small effect in all nuclei 1 and not in our current interests.…”
Section: Shake-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting shake-up and collisional ionization (Carlson, 1963a;Freedman, 1974), this can be described by the one-electron ionization probability (Couratin et al, 2013)…”
Section: Shake-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the T=1/2 mirror transitions [8], the mixing ratio is always the least known parameter [9]. In the case of 35 Ar and 19 Ne, all parameters involved in the determination of V ud , except , are presently known with relative precisions below the 10 -4 level. Accurate correlation measurements in their decays would then enable to significantly improve the current value of V ud deduced from the mirror transitions database [7]: (17), which is a factor of 10 less precise than the result deduced from the pure F transitions [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%