1977
DOI: 10.1021/j100532a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron scavenging in ethanol and in water

Abstract: Rate constants for scavenging solvated electrons, ea", mostly in the range ke-< 108 M"1 s"1, have been measured in ethanol and, as needed for comparison, in water. There is a tendency for feCs-to equal fce>q-over a 103-fold range, but there are instances where ke-is much greater. Inefficient scavengers for ea" provide relatively efficient traps for dry electrons e' with 37% survival often at C37 ^1M scavenger but also as low as ~0.2 M. The outstanding exceptions are olefins for which k< 107 M"1 s"1, but they d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(W) Experimental data; (v, 0) theoretical rate constant( k , , k2).conductance of each type of ion in the solution. By use of the limiting equivalent conductance of e-sol (1 70 cm2 $2-' equiv-')(Matheson, 1965) and of Na+ (45 cm2 E' equiv-') (Robinson 8zStokes, 1959), the relaxation time of the ionic atmosphere of e-sol is found to be 290 ps. This time is longer than the experimental half-lifetime of the reaction e-sol + NAD' (tl12 = log 2T = 215 ps for NAD', 0.101 M, pH 6.7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(W) Experimental data; (v, 0) theoretical rate constant( k , , k2).conductance of each type of ion in the solution. By use of the limiting equivalent conductance of e-sol (1 70 cm2 $2-' equiv-')(Matheson, 1965) and of Na+ (45 cm2 E' equiv-') (Robinson 8zStokes, 1959), the relaxation time of the ionic atmosphere of e-sol is found to be 290 ps. This time is longer than the experimental half-lifetime of the reaction e-sol + NAD' (tl12 = log 2T = 215 ps for NAD', 0.101 M, pH 6.7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selected irradiations were performed in an open glass tube in order to study the effect of oxygen on the radiation degradation. Buxton et al (1988) 9.0 × 10 6 Koehler et al (1985) 9.1 × 10 8 Buxton et al (1988) 7.9 × 10 9 Ashton et al (1995) 7.2 × 10 6 Gordon et al (1977) 1.1 × 10 9 Roduner and Bartels (1992) 7.7 × 10 9 Nickelsen et al (1994) 1.3 × 10 7 Marketos et al (1974) 1.3 × 10 7 Bansal et al (1971) Chlorobenzene 5.6 × 10 9 Ashton et al (1995) 9.1 × 10 8 Ye (1989) 1.4 × 10 9 Lichtscheidl and Getoff (1979b) 4.3 × 10 9 Nickelsen et al (1994) 5.0 × 10 8 Lichtscheidl and Getoff (1979a) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Neta and Schuler (1975) 4.4 × 10 7 Afanassiev et al (1979) 3.6 × 10 6 Draganic et al (1973) 3.0 × 10 7 Razem and Hamill (1977) 1.4 × 10 6 Neta et al (1971a) 3.8 × 10 7 Verma and Fessenden (1976) 2…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In polar solutions, intermolecular electron transfer faster than the picosecond solvation process has been investigated by fluorescence up-conversion but up to now competitive nonreactive electron dynamics (electron solvation) and ultrafast presolvation radical reactions in water have not be investigated at very short times. Nanosecond and picosecond pulse radiolysis studies have suggested that ultrafast radical reaction (univalent reduction of a solute) would involve hot electrons or short-lived precursors of hydrated electron. These indirect investigations determine the subnanosecond G value of solvated electrons for different electron scavenger concentrations. The pulse radiolysis experiments treat the data by determining empirical relationships between the rate constant of an electron transfer and the C 37 value, or stochastic analysis of competitive electron solvation and electron capture .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanosecond and picosecond pulse radiolysis studies have suggested that ultrafast radical reaction (univalent reduction of a solute) would involve hot electrons or short-lived precursors of hydrated electron. These indirect investigations determine the subnanosecond G value of solvated electrons for different electron scavenger concentrations. The pulse radiolysis experiments treat the data by determining empirical relationships between the rate constant of an electron transfer and the C 37 value, or stochastic analysis of competitive electron solvation and electron capture . The investigations of ultrafast electron transfers at the macroscopic level do not permit one (i) to understand in detail presolvation intermolecular charge transfer, and (ii) to determine the exact nature of early branching between short-lived nonreactive and reactive electronic configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%