International Tables for Crystallography 2007
DOI: 10.1107/97809553602060000939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron powder diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this evaluation approach, microscope lens distortions were parametrized as elliptical distortion, and higher-order distortions were neglected (note that the treatment of higher-order distortions is not implemented in currently available electron diffraction processing software). The FWHM values of the diffraction peaks were determined by fitting the pseudo-Voigt function [ 5 ] using Origin 2023b (10.05) software. Rietveld analysis was carried out using MAUD 2.99 software [ 21 , 22 ] with atomic scattering factors for electrons [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this evaluation approach, microscope lens distortions were parametrized as elliptical distortion, and higher-order distortions were neglected (note that the treatment of higher-order distortions is not implemented in currently available electron diffraction processing software). The FWHM values of the diffraction peaks were determined by fitting the pseudo-Voigt function [ 5 ] using Origin 2023b (10.05) software. Rietveld analysis was carried out using MAUD 2.99 software [ 21 , 22 ] with atomic scattering factors for electrons [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rietveld method is used less for the evaluation of electron diffraction patterns obtained from nanomaterials (SAED or EPD), mostly because of the potentially high contribution of multiple scattered electrons [ 5 ] and also because of the large influence of the setting of electron optics on the variation in detected intensity. The effect of multiple scattering on diffraction peak intensities as a function of the average atomic number and crystal thickness has been analyzed in the published literature in detail [ 5 ]. In nanocrystalline materials, in general, it is much weaker than single crystal samples [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that even for nanoscale particles with isotropic ring patterns dynamic electron scattering cannot be fully ruled out, and quantification using Rietveld refinement requires dynamical corrections such as the two-beam approximation (Figure ). , Analysis software, such as MAUD, is freely available for this. Conversely, precession electron diffraction, where the electron beam is tilted and rotated in the form of a hollow cone, is an empirical way to mitigate the effect of dynamical scattering .…”
Section: Imaging and Spectroscopy In Operando Em Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, adequate compensation of elliptical distortions is essential, which can nowadays be achieved by effective machine learning algorithms . Those high-quality electron diffraction patterns can then also be used for pair distribution function (PDF) analysis. ,, This total scattering approach allows us to conclude on the nearest neighbors (local structures), domain, and particle sizes. This technique has been powerful enough to conclude on local structures in amorphous IrO x or AuAg NPs. , …”
Section: Imaging and Spectroscopy In Operando Em Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%