The paramagnetic triple‐decker complexes [(Cp*Ru)2{μ‐(CMe)3(BCl)(BMe)}] (3b) and [(Cp*Ru)2{μ‐(CMe)3(BCl)2}] (3c) are formed by refluxing a mixture of [Cp*RuCl]4 and pentamethyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,3‐diborole in thf. In CH2Cl2 under air complex 3b slowly looses a hydrogen atom with formation of the diamagnetic triple‐decker [(Cp*Ru)2{μ‐η5:η6‐(CMe)3(BCl)(BCH2)}] (4b) with the unsymmetrical dihydrodiborafulvene derivative in a bridging position. The analogous complex [(Cp*Ru)2{μ‐η5:η6‐(CMe)3(BMe)‐(BCH2)}] (4a) is obtained by interaction of HCl with the triple‐decker [(Cp*Ru)2{μ‐(CMe)3(BMe)2}] (3a). According to calculations, complexes 4a and 4b have an almost non‐distorted triple‐decker arrangement with a strong bending of the B=CH2 group toward one of the Ru atoms. For the formation of 3b and 3c the chloro‐containing sandwich complexes [Cp*Ru{η5‐(CMe)3(BCl)(BR1)}] (2b,c; R1 = Me, Cl) are proposed as intermediates. The constitutions of the complexes are derived from NMR, MS and DFT data, and the molecular structure of 3b is confirmed by an X‐ray diffraction analysis.