2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00269-010-0391-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of Fe3+ ions in amethyst: thermodynamic potentials and magnetic susceptibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5(a) and 5(b) show that log 10 (N) of the E 1 ' center at g = 2.0 for natural and 10 kGy γ-ray-irradiated amethyst correlates linearly with the reciprocal of temperature (1/T). The slope of this correlation yields the activation energy Ea at -0.03 and -0.02 eV, for E 1 ' of natural and 10 kGy γ-ray-irradiated amethyst, which is consistent with those reported for Fe 3+ in amethysts (Sivaramaiah et al, 2011;Sivaramaiah and Pan, 2012). The pre-exponential coefficient (PEC) has been determined to be 56, 54 per second for E 1 ' in natural and 10 kGy γ-ray-irradiated amethyst from In the calculation of activation energy, we observed negative slope from origin programme and therefore the activation energy is negative.…”
Section: G Sivaramaiahsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5(a) and 5(b) show that log 10 (N) of the E 1 ' center at g = 2.0 for natural and 10 kGy γ-ray-irradiated amethyst correlates linearly with the reciprocal of temperature (1/T). The slope of this correlation yields the activation energy Ea at -0.03 and -0.02 eV, for E 1 ' of natural and 10 kGy γ-ray-irradiated amethyst, which is consistent with those reported for Fe 3+ in amethysts (Sivaramaiah et al, 2011;Sivaramaiah and Pan, 2012). The pre-exponential coefficient (PEC) has been determined to be 56, 54 per second for E 1 ' in natural and 10 kGy γ-ray-irradiated amethyst from In the calculation of activation energy, we observed negative slope from origin programme and therefore the activation energy is negative.…”
Section: G Sivaramaiahsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The activation energy represents minimum energy required to liberate an electron from E 1 ' in this amethyst (Sivaramaiah, 2011). The activation energy is slightly more in 10 kGy γ-ray-irradiated amethyst (-0.02 eV)) than natural amethyst (-0.03 eV).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EPR spectra are essentially featureless, except for the presence of trace and variable amounts of the rhombic Fe 3+ signal at the effective g value of ~4.38 ( Figure 6) [14,15]. …”
Section: Electron Paramegnetic Resonance (Epr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPR measurements for amethyst crystals proved that ferric (Fe 3+ ) ions are present in substituted orthorhombic sites with a g factor of about 4.28 (SivaRamaiah et al 2011) and in interstitial sites, in channels, with a g factor close to 2.0023. Research conducted by Weil (1984Weil ( , 1994 has proven that Fe 3+ ions in amethyst are present in tetrahedral sites and are accompanied by different positive ion compensators (Li, Na, H), with g factors close to 2.00 and different E/D factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%