2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2007.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and stable isotope records of paleoenvironmental conditions during peat formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies suggested that the g -factors less than 2.00300 were typical for (C-centered) free radicals 23,24 . Oxygen-centered (O-centered) free radicals usually possess the g -factor larger than 2.00400, such as semiquinone or phenoxyl radicals 25,26 . And radical signals with g -factors of 2.00300–2.00400 are attributed to a combination of the C-centered and O-centered EPFRs 26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies suggested that the g -factors less than 2.00300 were typical for (C-centered) free radicals 23,24 . Oxygen-centered (O-centered) free radicals usually possess the g -factor larger than 2.00400, such as semiquinone or phenoxyl radicals 25,26 . And radical signals with g -factors of 2.00300–2.00400 are attributed to a combination of the C-centered and O-centered EPFRs 26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen-centered (O-centered) free radicals usually possess the g -factor larger than 2.00400, such as semiquinone or phenoxyl radicals 25,26 . And radical signals with g -factors of 2.00300–2.00400 are attributed to a combination of the C-centered and O-centered EPFRs 26 . Obviously, the EPR spectrum of SHC 180-2-7 in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the non-contaminated/background soil samples exhibited a much weaker signal, a doublet signal for the Georgia soil (g-factors: ~2.00340 and ΔHp-p: ~8.0 Gauss), a singlet signal for the Montana soil (g-factors: ~2.00290 and ΔHp-p: ~6.0 Gauss), and a singlet signal for the Washington sediment (g-factors: ~2.00270 and ΔHp-p: 9.0 Gauss). Such narrow lines with the g-factors between 2.003–2.008 are typical of the organic radicals [5, 26–31]. Based on the intensity of the observed radical signals relative to the mass of the sample, the radical concentration in the contaminated soils and sediments were ~30x, ~12x, and ~2x higher than the non-contaminated counterpart at the Georgia, Montana, and Washington sites, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radical signals with g-factors of 2.003 and above are attributed to oxygen-centered radicals or carbon-centered radicals with a nearby heteroatom, such as oxygen or halogen that increases the spin-orbit coupling constant [5, 26–31]. Considering the similar source of the soil contamination for the Georgia and Montana sites, the increase in intensity of the radical signal for contaminated soils along with the similarities of the spectral parameters the single paramagnetic signal was attributed to pentachlorophenoxyl as a result of the PCP contamination history.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation