2017
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2017.1332396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron–nucleus scalar–pseudoscalar interaction in PbF: Z-vector study in the relativistic coupled-cluster framework

Abstract: The scalar-pseudoscalar interaction constant of PbF in its ground state electronic configuration is calculated using the Z-vector method in the relativistic coupled-cluster framework. The precise calculated value is very important to set upper bound limit on P, T -odd scalar-pseudoscalar interaction constant, ks, from the experimentally observed P, T -odd frequency shift. Further, the ratio of the effective electric field to the scalar-pseudoscalar interaction constant is also calculated which is required to g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that although we correlate all the electrons to compute our most reliable results, they are not completely free from the error associated with core correlation effects since we use dyall.cv4z basis sets, which are designed only to treat core-valence correlation. However, relying on our previous studies [35,51,53] we expect this error to be negligible for BaF as well. Nevertheless, ignoring the mutual cancellations of different possible sources of error and assuming the errors to be independent, we can argue that the uncertainty in our most reliable results for the P, T -odd molecular parameters of BaF is within 8%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth mentioning that although we correlate all the electrons to compute our most reliable results, they are not completely free from the error associated with core correlation effects since we use dyall.cv4z basis sets, which are designed only to treat core-valence correlation. However, relying on our previous studies [35,51,53] we expect this error to be negligible for BaF as well. Nevertheless, ignoring the mutual cancellations of different possible sources of error and assuming the errors to be independent, we can argue that the uncertainty in our most reliable results for the P, T -odd molecular parameters of BaF is within 8%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recently, Sasmal et al [21] extended the Z-vector technique into the four-component relativistic CCSD framework and successfully implemented the method to precisely calculate various AIC properties of molecules [12,14,34,35]. For more detailed knowledge of the Z-vector method, one can see references [36][37][38].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this analytical relationship has been confirmed numerically in numerous electronic-structure studies of EDM enhancements and Ne-SPS interactions on other systems, for instance in Refs. [17,18,[60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Use Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, a number of notable attempts have been made to measure the electron's EDM (eEDM) using ultracold heavy polar diatomic molecules such as YbF [11], ThO [7], BaF [14], and HfF + [12]. In addition to the eEDM, there are a few significant sources of CP violation, viz., (i) intrinsic EDM of nucleons, (ii) P, T -odd electron-nucleon interaction, (iii) P, T -odd nucleon-nucleon interactions, etc., which results in the permanent EDM of a molecule [4][5][6][7][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. That is why, providing robust limits on the fundamental constants corresponding to these P, T -odd sources from molecular EDM experiments is not an easy task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%