1999
DOI: 10.1070/pu1999v042n10abeh000492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron momentum spectroscopy of atoms, molecules, and thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter process represents the basis of the Electron Momentum Spectroscopy (EMS) [2,3] and is commonly seen as the most effective method for direct investigation of both electron target distribution and electronelectron correlations [4][5][6]. In these conditions, one could objectively expect that the capture reaction at small scattering angles can also provide exclusive information in the kinematical domains beyond that of the EMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This latter process represents the basis of the Electron Momentum Spectroscopy (EMS) [2,3] and is commonly seen as the most effective method for direct investigation of both electron target distribution and electronelectron correlations [4][5][6]. In these conditions, one could objectively expect that the capture reaction at small scattering angles can also provide exclusive information in the kinematical domains beyond that of the EMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Under these conditions, the transition operator depends solely upon the coordinates of the impinging electron and of the two ejected electrons. This approximation is designed for the kinematic situation on the Bethe ridge [1][2][3][4] where the momentum of the ionized electron is equal in magnitude to the momentum transferred from the incident to the scattered electron, ensuring thereby a clean ''knock-out'' process, a condition which is best satisfied experimentally by a symmetric noncoplanar set-up. In the framework of the first Born (or sudden) approximation, the incident electron is assumed to interact with the target only once.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the incident electron only interacts with the ejected electrons and neither affects the target nor is affected by the target, the impulse approximation is considered, and a simple relationships prevails between the azimuthal angle under which the electrons are collected and the momentum of the ejected electron prior to ionization. Modeling the incident and outgoing electrons as plane waves yields ultimately the Plane Wave Impulse Approximation (PWIA) [1][2][3][4], which implies that the energies of the unbound electrons are so high that their interactions with the residual ion are negligible. Upon the assumption that all these approximations are valid (e, 2e), ionization cross-sections for specific ionization channels in EMS conditions ultimately relate to spherically averaged and resolution folded structure factors that are obtained as the square of the Fourier Transform toward momentum space of the relevant Dyson orbitals, defined [8][9][10][11] as partial overlaps between the neutral initial ground state and final ionized state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter case, the binary reaction, is usually employed for the Electron Momentum Spectroscopy (EMS) of the target, where one measures momentum distribution of the knocked-out electron in the target. Further information on EMS can be found in review papers [14][15][16] and in the book [17]. Later, even more sophisticated experiments of both kinds were performed for (e,3e) ionization [13,15,[18][19][20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%