Electron microscopy situation in the diagnosis of minimal change disease; a 16-year survey

Abstract

Introduction: Minimal change disease (MCD) is one of the most common diseases affecting glomeruli and causing nephrotic syndrome in both adults and children. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of accordance between light, fluorescent, and electron microscopies in the diagnosis of MCD. Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated kidney biopsies which were sent to the referral electron microscopy unit (affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) from 2001 to 2016. The final diagnosis of MCD was based on the electron microscopy (EM) study. For each patient, the primary light microscopy (LM) finding was compared with EM diagnosis. The available patients’ demographic, clinical, and paraclinical data were extracted. All the statistical analysis was performed in SPSS 19.0 and P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Among all 2865 kidney biopsies, the data of 143 (5.0%) patients with approved MCD by EM were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 23.1± 17.4 years since most of them were male (54.9%). Normal blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine were observed in 76.6% and 78.6% of them respectively. Around, 140 (97.9%) of patients had no tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. The role of EM in the diagnosis of MCD for 61 (50.0%) of cases were essential, for 61 (50.0%) cases were helpful while there was no case with the role of non-necessary. The immunofluorescence (IF) study was performed for 99 (69.2%) patients. Among them, it was negative for 60 (60.6%) of cases and was positive for IgM and C3 in 19 (19.2%) and 11 (11.1%) of cases respectively. The proportion of flank pain was significantly higher among adults. Conclusion: The importance of EM for the diagnosis of MCD is indispensable and undeniable; while LM is not capable of independently leading to a certain diagnosis of MCD. Considering the limitations of using EM, the results obtained from this study can help with the appropriate use of electron microscopy and help physicians to reach earlier diagnosed.

The Evolution and Scope of Cardiac Amyloidosis Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Echocardiography

“…Amyloidosis, a systemic disease, signi cantly impacts multiple vital organs. Beyond cardiac implications, primary systemic amyloidosis affects the autonomic and peripheral nerves 1 , soft tissue (carpal tunnel syndrome, microphthalmia, nail dystrophy, rash) [2][3][4][5][6] , digestion system (hepatomegaly, dermatitis) 6 , kidney (nephrotic syndrome, proteinuria) 7 . CA, the most severe amyloidosis form, accounts for 40% of related fatalities 8 .…”

Metabolomic fingerprinting for biomarker discovery in renal amyloidosis

“…The diagnosis of MCD is often challenging for the clinicians due to its common symptoms and absence of any histopathological hallmarks in light microscopy [14]. Electron microscopic imaging of renal tissue specimen, showing effacement of the foot processes of glomerular podocytes is the only confirmed diagnostic signature for these patients [15]. Progression of MCD often weakens the structural integrity of glomerulus showing overlapping symptoms with other diseases including renal amyloidosis [16].…”