2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron microscopy, immunostaining, cytoskeleton visualization, in situ hybridization, and three-dimensional reconstruction of Xenopus oocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semithin sections (0.7-1.0 μm) were stained with 1% methylene blue in 1% borax and examined with a Leica DMR (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) microscope. Ultrathin sections (70-100 nm) were contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate according to standard protocols [14]; the sections were then examined in a JEOL 100SX transmission electron microscope (JEM, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.…”
Section: Embedding and Sectioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semithin sections (0.7-1.0 μm) were stained with 1% methylene blue in 1% borax and examined with a Leica DMR (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) microscope. Ultrathin sections (70-100 nm) were contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate according to standard protocols [14]; the sections were then examined in a JEOL 100SX transmission electron microscope (JEM, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.…”
Section: Embedding and Sectioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological images analyzed via specialist software can also be used for 3D reconstruction of internal organ structure. This method was applied in the reconstruction of the structure of testis cords within developing mouse testes (Nel-Themaat et al 2009) and ovarian follicles in Xenopus (Bilinski et al 2010).…”
Section: Histology: Light and Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colloid gold or nanogold conjugated to secondary antibody are used in this technique. Both the pre-embedding and post-embedding versions of the IGS method were presented in detail by Bilinski et al (2010). In most commonly used post-embedding IGS methods, the tissue is gently fixed in PFA with or without glutaraldehyde (strong fixation and osmium tetroxide postfixation should be omitted in order not to disrupt immunoreactivity), dehydrated, embedded in hydrophilic resin, and cut on formvar-carbon-coated nickel grids; the grids with ultrathin sections are applied onto drops of the following solutions: blocking solution (BSA), primary antibodies, rinsing, secondary antibodies, rinsing, and contrast staining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate.…”
Section: Histology: Light and Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blocking, antibody incubation and washing steps were performed exactly as described in Bilinski et al (2010). Light microscopy cytokeratin immunostaining was performed by using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated C11 anti-pan cytokeratin antibody (cat.…”
Section: Light and Electron Microscopy Cytokeratin Immunostainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oocyte vegetal cortexes were observed under a Nikon fluorescence microscope. Electron microscopy immunostaining was performed as described in detail in Bilinski et al (2010).…”
Section: Light and Electron Microscopy Cytokeratin Immunostainingmentioning
confidence: 99%