1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb06728.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Microscopic Study of the Adherence Properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus

Abstract: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to observe the means by which three strains of Lactobacillus rrcidophilus adhere to surfaces. When observed with SEM, all strains adhered to glass coverslips; however, no attachment fib& were seen. When viewed with TEM, strain BG2F04 showed a polysaccharide (PS) material outside the cell wall. This strain had previously been shown to adhere strongly to human intestinal tissue cells, while strain Lac 12 had shown weak adhere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A targeted approach for identifying adhesion factors and creating isogenic chromosomal mutations allows us to systematically evaluate cell surface proteins for their contributions to adherence or attachment capability. Previous studies have concentrated on identifying the locations of adhesive determinants (16,20), determining the nature of adhesive determinants (8,10,(17)(18)(19), comparing the adhesiveness of different strains (8,42), or identifying adhesion molecules using binding assays (17,22,33). In contrast, this is the first study that has relied on genome sequence data to identify multiple cell surface proteins potentially involved in adhesion and specifically investigated their individual contributions via isogenic strain comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A targeted approach for identifying adhesion factors and creating isogenic chromosomal mutations allows us to systematically evaluate cell surface proteins for their contributions to adherence or attachment capability. Previous studies have concentrated on identifying the locations of adhesive determinants (16,20), determining the nature of adhesive determinants (8,10,(17)(18)(19), comparing the adhesiveness of different strains (8,42), or identifying adhesion molecules using binding assays (17,22,33). In contrast, this is the first study that has relied on genome sequence data to identify multiple cell surface proteins potentially involved in adhesion and specifically investigated their individual contributions via isogenic strain comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Together, this set shows high synteny to reported EPS clusters in streptococci (40) and recently reported in L. gasseri and L. johnsonii (6). Scanning electron microscopy of NCFM did not detect an external polysaccharide layer (41), and it remains unclear whether the EPS cluster is functional or whether any EPS produced is excreted rather than anchored. Three ORFs in the NCFM EPS cluster encode for two UDP-galactopyranose mutases and a membrane protein involved with the export of O-antigen and teichoic acid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Identification of putative adhesins of lactobacilli is also at a preliminary stage. Protein (Conway and Kjelleberg, 1989;Henrikson et al, 1991;Cocconier et al, 1992), carbohydrate (Hood and Zottola, 1989), and lipoteichoic acid adhesins (Sherman and Savage, 1986) have been reported to occur on the surfaces of intestinal lactobacilli, but none has been identified in oral strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%