2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b12102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Localization Function and Compton Profiles of Cu2O

Abstract: The nature of bonding in the cubic cuprous oxide is studied by means of the theoretical tools, namely, the electron localization function and Compton profiles. The isotropic Compton profiles together with the anisotropies in the directional Compton profiles are presented. Taking free-atom Compton profiles, the charge-transfer model is also applied. The first-principles calculations based on the GGA are performed, and the self-interaction correction is incorporated, adopting the GGA+U approach. Both types of ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Bader charge analysis [details in Supporting Information (SI)], the Cu‐to‐ O L charge transfer is 0.14 e . The mapping of the electron localization function (ELF, Figure 1 g) demonstrates that the localized charge is distributed near O L , confirming an ionic bonding between O L and the Cu substrate [34] . As a result, the adsorption energy of BCPM on Cu(111) in this structural phase is −1.79 eV per molecule, and the intermolecular interaction is −0.51 eV per molecule.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Based on Bader charge analysis [details in Supporting Information (SI)], the Cu‐to‐ O L charge transfer is 0.14 e . The mapping of the electron localization function (ELF, Figure 1 g) demonstrates that the localized charge is distributed near O L , confirming an ionic bonding between O L and the Cu substrate [34] . As a result, the adsorption energy of BCPM on Cu(111) in this structural phase is −1.79 eV per molecule, and the intermolecular interaction is −0.51 eV per molecule.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Electron Localization and Magnetic Spin Distributions. In order to gain some insight into the electron density range and chemical bonding nature as Li is inserted, we used the electron localization function (ELF) 35 derived from our DFT calculations. The electron localization in each system was assessed via a topological analysis by slicing a 2-D lattice plane through the dopant sites to display the chemical bonding at the regions of the transition metal atom of interest in relation to four of the surrounding oxygen atoms (see Supporting Information to view the exact Miller indices of each plane).…”
Section: ■ Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Bader charge analysis [details in Supporting Information (SI)], the Cu-to-O L charge transfer is 0.14 e. The mapping of the electron localization function (ELF, Figure 1 g) demonstrates that the localized charge is distributed near O L , confirming an ionic bonding between O L and the Cu substrate. [34] As a result, the adsorption energy of BCPM on Cu(111) in this structural phase is À1.79 eV per molecule, and the intermolecular interaction is À0.51 eV per molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%