2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.82.043405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-ion interaction effects in attosecond time-resolved photoelectron spectra

Abstract: Photoionization by attosecond extreme ultraviolet (xuv) pulses into the laser-dressed continuum of the ionized atom is commonly described in strong-field approximation, neglecting the Coulomb interaction between the emitted photoelectron (PE) and the residual ion. By solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, we identify a temporal shift δτ in streaked PE spectra, which becomes significant at low PE energies. Within an eikonal approximation, we trace this shift to the combined action of Coulomb and laser… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
131
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(60 reference statements)
6
131
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative time delays have also been measured between different atomic species [12][13][14], between single and double ionization [15], between different angles of photoemission [16] and between the ion ground state and shake-up states [17]. In the case of atomic photoionization it has been established that the measured atomic delay τ A can be separated into a Wigner-like delay [18][19][20], τ W , here associated with the one-photon XUV ionization process, and a contribution from the interaction with the laser and long-range ionic field, τ CC , called the continuum-continuum delay (or Coulomb-laser coupling delay) [21][22][23]. The τ CC term is "universal" in the sense that it depends only on the kinetic energy of the photoelectron, the photon energy of the laser field and the charge of the remaining ion (Z = 1 for neutral targets).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative time delays have also been measured between different atomic species [12][13][14], between single and double ionization [15], between different angles of photoemission [16] and between the ion ground state and shake-up states [17]. In the case of atomic photoionization it has been established that the measured atomic delay τ A can be separated into a Wigner-like delay [18][19][20], τ W , here associated with the one-photon XUV ionization process, and a contribution from the interaction with the laser and long-range ionic field, τ CC , called the continuum-continuum delay (or Coulomb-laser coupling delay) [21][22][23]. The τ CC term is "universal" in the sense that it depends only on the kinetic energy of the photoelectron, the photon energy of the laser field and the charge of the remaining ion (Z = 1 for neutral targets).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dipole-length-gauge interaction emphasizes large distances [30]. It is thus appropriate for large distances z > 0 on the vacuum side of the metal-vacuum interface where our approximate representation of the true final-state wave function in terms of a "Volkov" wave function (see below) is more accurate than for small distances [31]. Our use of the dipole-length gauge is furthermore motivated by length-gauge SFA calculations for atomic ionization processes matching exact numerical calculations [32].…”
Section: A Transition Amplitude For Streaked Photoemissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe the release and propagation of the PE wave packet δψ n (z,t) from occupied substrate states ψ n (z,t) by solving the TDSE [11],…”
Section: A Static Image Potential With Phenomelogical Modeling Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essential for the correct reproduction of this shift within quantum mechanical models [10,11] is the proper inclusion of (i) the photoelectron's (PE's) phase evolution in the IR laser field during streaked emission, (ii) the attenuation of the IR pulse inside the solid (skin effect), and (iii) PE transport effects in the solid [12,13]. The release and subsequent motion of the PE in and in front of a solid dielectric medium provoke collective electron excitations in the solid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%