2013
DOI: 10.4208/jams.022812.032212a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-impact ionization of SiCl, SiCl<sub>2</sub> and SiCl<sub>4</sub> molecules

Abstract: Abstract. Total ionization collision cross sections are calculated for silicon chloride compounds namely SiCl, SiCl 2 and SiCl 4 applying binary -encounter -Bethe (BEB) and modified BEB model for projectile energy from the ionization threshold to 1000 eV. The total ionization cross sections obtained using the binary-encounter-Bethe (BEB) model and the modified BEB model are compared with experimental and theoretical results. This model has been found to be successful for a wide range of molecules but for silic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross sections at 70 eV of the species of interest here are not available, so that the scaling step had to be omitted in this work. Based on the only cross sections that have been reported in the literature for silicon containing species, e.g., SiH 4 , Si 2 H 6 , Si­(CH 3 ) 4 , SiO, and SiO 2 , , we assume that this omission will not greatly increase the inaccuracy of the method because they vary by less than 30% at 17 eV. Ionization energies are needed to shift the ionization cross section curves appropriately. They were calculated in this work by quantum chemical calculations for the most important intermediates of interest: SiO 2 , Si­(OH) 4 , Si­(CH 3 ) 2 OH, Si­(CH 3 )­(OH) 2 , and Si­(OH) 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cross sections at 70 eV of the species of interest here are not available, so that the scaling step had to be omitted in this work. Based on the only cross sections that have been reported in the literature for silicon containing species, e.g., SiH 4 , Si 2 H 6 , Si­(CH 3 ) 4 , SiO, and SiO 2 , , we assume that this omission will not greatly increase the inaccuracy of the method because they vary by less than 30% at 17 eV. Ionization energies are needed to shift the ionization cross section curves appropriately. They were calculated in this work by quantum chemical calculations for the most important intermediates of interest: SiO 2 , Si­(OH) 4 , Si­(CH 3 ) 2 OH, Si­(CH 3 )­(OH) 2 , and Si­(OH) 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gas flow, pressure, and ionization energy, are compensated and only the uncertainties of the cross sections have a significant influence on the absolute uncertainties of the mole fractions. The error in the cross sections is usually under ±50%. , The error for experimentally determined calibration factors is expected to be 15%. For intermediate species calibrated by the modified RICS method the absolute uncertainty of the mole fractions is between 30–60%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%