1973
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/6/9/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron impact ionization of neon and argon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also cite MSB [7] and Nagy, Skutlartz, and Schmidt [22] for obtaining energydependent shapes for partial cross sections that are consistent with the results cited above. Other investigators have obtained good agreement with these studies for the rare gases, but not over an extensive range of energy and ion charge [9,10,35,36]. We limit our comparison to what we judge to be the most extensive and reliable mea- up to a factor of 2 [3 -7].…”
Section: Estimation Of Errorsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We also cite MSB [7] and Nagy, Skutlartz, and Schmidt [22] for obtaining energydependent shapes for partial cross sections that are consistent with the results cited above. Other investigators have obtained good agreement with these studies for the rare gases, but not over an extensive range of energy and ion charge [9,10,35,36]. We limit our comparison to what we judge to be the most extensive and reliable mea- up to a factor of 2 [3 -7].…”
Section: Estimation Of Errorsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…3(c), the cross sections of elastic scattering and impact ionization are close to the geometrical cross section of the atom. As an example, the impact ionization cross section of neutral argon does not exceed the value of σ max ≈ 3 • 10 −16 cm 2 [56]. Taking for an estimate the concentration of neutral atoms survived after the field ionization equal to n a 10 18 cm −3 and the same for the concentration of electrons, we obtain that impact ionization can increase the concentration of electrons by σ max n a v 0 τ ≈ 0.1 of its initial value during the time interval τ = 1ps.…”
Section: Collective Dynamics Of the Electron Plasma And Radiationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…After careful calibrations of the target-gas pressure and temperature as well as collection length Kurepa et a1 (1974) measured the cross sections for Ar from 19 to 200 eV and found them to be in close agreement with those of Rapp and Englander-Golden (1965), thus concluding that the experiments which employed the McLeod gauge suffered from the systematic error in pressure measurement unless corrected properly. Unfortunately both the measurements by Fletcher and Cowling (1973) and Kurepa et a1 (1974) which support the measurements of Rapp and Englander-Golden (1965) were not carried out for all the rare-gas species, and in a wider range of energies. The recent results of Montague et a1 (1984) on helium using a fast-atom-beam technique are in very good agreement with those of Rapp and Englander-Golden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%