1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.74.3364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Impact Ionization ofC60

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of coupling to inelastic channels may therefore be expected to improve the performance of the SMC method at higher energies in the present case; however, two considerations argue against this view. First, the shape of the SMC DCSs for C 60 agrees quite well with the present measurements at 100 and 150 eV, in the energy range where the electron-impact ionization cross section of C 60 is maximal [33,34]. Second, the spherical-shell and independent-atom and Born models also neglect inelastic channels, yet each describes the fall-off of the DCS with angle at the higher energies better than the SMC calculation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The inclusion of coupling to inelastic channels may therefore be expected to improve the performance of the SMC method at higher energies in the present case; however, two considerations argue against this view. First, the shape of the SMC DCSs for C 60 agrees quite well with the present measurements at 100 and 150 eV, in the energy range where the electron-impact ionization cross section of C 60 is maximal [33,34]. Second, the spherical-shell and independent-atom and Born models also neglect inelastic channels, yet each describes the fall-off of the DCS with angle at the higher energies better than the SMC calculation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Apparently direct vibrational excitation leads preferentially to evaporation, whereas electronic excitation is responsible for multifragmentation. In the intermediate range we find indications for a "transparency window" similar to that predicted recently in simulations of Na The interaction of fullerenes with particles such as photons [1], electrons [2], and ions [3] leads to fragmentation patterns which can serve as a fingerprint of the interaction process. Ion-fullerene (and fullerene-ion-atom) collisions have been studied for different collision systems at a variety of collision velocities and projectile charge states recently.…”
Section: Strong Velocity Effects In Collisions Ofmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…8) by single electron collision in the energy range from threshold up to 1000 eV, including ions with charge states up to z = 4 and fragment ions down to C,, [30]. For these measurements we used the crossed beams apparatus described above invoking, however, for these measurements a novel technique for the absolute calibration of the cross-sections (see below).…”
Section: Absolute Partial and Total Ionization Cross-sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that the one previous calibration [65]-using a Knudsen cell approach-leads to total counting crosssections which are also larger than these geometric cross-sections. A more detailed account of the measured C,, cross-sections and also of those of C,, will be presented in [38] (see also [30]). …”
Section: Absolute Partial and Total Ionization Cross-sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%