1990
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.41.3603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-impact ionization of highly charged hydrogenic atomic ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results presented in Ref. [5] show only a 3% difference between the 1s ionization cross section for uranium calculated with the Mdller interaction and that cross section calculated without the Mdller interaction, at 198 keV. However, in that investigation, the Mdller interaction was included only in a noexchange scattering approximation.…”
Section: Pacs Number(s): 3480kwmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results presented in Ref. [5] show only a 3% difference between the 1s ionization cross section for uranium calculated with the Mdller interaction and that cross section calculated without the Mdller interaction, at 198 keV. However, in that investigation, the Mdller interaction was included only in a noexchange scattering approximation.…”
Section: Pacs Number(s): 3480kwmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In a previous investigation of the effects of the Mbller interaction on 1s ionization cross sections, Moores and Pindzola concluded that the magnetic interactions and retar-dation effects become important only when the incidentelectron energy exceeds about 250 keV [5]. Results presented in Ref.…”
Section: Pacs Number(s): 3480kwmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The MCDF method has also been applied to the calculation of electron-impact excitation (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and ionization (18) cross sections for atomic ions. The MCDF method has also been applied to the calculation of electron-impact excitation (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and ionization (18) cross sections for atomic ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement is verified by noting the excellent agreement tween our RDvV results and from refs. [84] Finally, the results of [83] from all of the others in two ways. these results were computed with the full lowest-order QED interaction for electrons scattering with a bound electron.…”
Section: The Non-factorized Approach To Computing Ionization Cross Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entries from [84] were calculated with the RDW program was used to compute ionization contribution in [85], as opposed to the indirect excitation-autoionization contribution computed ref. [86].…”
Section: The Non-factorized Approach To Computing Ionization Cross Sementioning
confidence: 99%