2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron impact ionization of 1-propanol

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.  Appearance energies and Wannier exponents for 16… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that while that estimate is conservative, it is not unreasonable. Recent TICS measurements with the primary alcohols, [23][24][25] which are liquids at room temperature, reported uncertainties up to ;12%. As any measurements with beryllium would be a degree of difficulty more challenging, our 620% uncertainty estimate on our recommended TICS is highly plausible.…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that while that estimate is conservative, it is not unreasonable. Recent TICS measurements with the primary alcohols, [23][24][25] which are liquids at room temperature, reported uncertainties up to ;12%. As any measurements with beryllium would be a degree of difficulty more challenging, our 620% uncertainty estimate on our recommended TICS is highly plausible.…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the two maximum cross sections is very small. Except near the ionization threshold, the experimental data of Pires et al [14] lie between two curves, i.e., σ TPK & σ TP (Ave.). The cross sections σ TP are in excellent agreement with the experimental results measured by Hudson et al [9] up to E = 69 eV, but they under-estimate the experimental values by 14% at higher energies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The above expression may be obtained by taking the average of Equations (12) and 13. Now we replace E by E in upper limit of integral of Equations (12)- (14) and in the expression of recoil energy, Q min , given by Equation 7. With these two modifications, we integrate the Equations (12)- (14) and obtain…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations