1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(81)80486-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron impact ionisation energies of some halo-cyclotriphosphazenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also obtained in terms of total energy differences between the neutral and the positively and negatively charged molecule, namely with the SCF method. This returns a quasiparticle energy gap I MOL − A MOL of 11.02 eV, in good agreement (within 4.5%) with the experimental value [25,26]. Likewise we also determine the Fermi level (W F ) of graphene, which is found to be 4.45 eV.…”
Section: A Single Benzene On Pristine Graphenesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is also obtained in terms of total energy differences between the neutral and the positively and negatively charged molecule, namely with the SCF method. This returns a quasiparticle energy gap I MOL − A MOL of 11.02 eV, in good agreement (within 4.5%) with the experimental value [25,26]. Likewise we also determine the Fermi level (W F ) of graphene, which is found to be 4.45 eV.…”
Section: A Single Benzene On Pristine Graphenesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A likely candidate would be AsBr 4 + [Al(OR) 4 ] À , which we have shown to react with CS 2 to give CS 2 Br 3 + . [61] Since the ionization energies-as a measure of the HOMO energies-of CS 2 (10.08 eV) [62] and (PNCl 2 ) 3 (10.05 eV) [63] are very similar, the use of AsBr 4 + as an ionizing agent is promising (e.g., AsBr 4 + + P 3 N 3 X 3 !P 3 N 3 X 5 + + BrX + AsBr 3 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%