2019
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2019-100010-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-impact excitations of highly charged tungsten ions and polarization study of their successive photon decay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the applications of our RDW method in our recent work [28][29][30][31][32] on electron impact excitation of highly charged…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the applications of our RDW method in our recent work [28][29][30][31][32] on electron impact excitation of highly charged…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have employed relativistic distorted wave (RDW) method [27] to calculate the electron excitation cross sections in the scattered electron energy range up to 1500 eV. The RDW method has been successfully implemented in our previous work on highly charged ions [28][29][30][31][32]. For the cross section calculations, the wavefunctions of the target ion bound states as well as of the continuum states of the projectile incident and scattered electrons are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensures the quality of the target ion's wavefunctions that are crucial in determining the accuracy of the scattering parameters. Moreover, the RDW method has been successfully implemented in the previous work on a variety of targets from closed to open-shell systems and neutral atoms to multiply or highly charged ions atoms/ions [25][26][27][28][29][30]. It has also been found that using RDW cross sections in a collisional radiative (CR) model provides plasma parameters that are in better agreement with the measurements [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Cross Sections and Rate Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 97%