2007
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/s09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Fabry–Perot interferometer with two entangled magnetic impurities

Abstract: We consider a one-dimensional (1D) wire along which single conduction electrons can propagate in the presence of two spin-1/2 magnetic impurities. The electron may be scattered by each impurity via a contact-exchange interaction and thus a spin-flip generally occurs at each scattering event. Adopting a quantum waveguide theory approach, we derive the stationary states of the system at all orders in the electron-impurity exchange coupling constant. This allows us to investigate electron transmission for arbitra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (2) shows that under RCs, because [Ŝ 2 ,V RC ] = 0,Ŝ 2 is a constant of motion. Here, we indicate with | − s,N the singlet state of N scattering centers of spin quantum number s. In the case of N = 2 and for an unpolarized spin state of e, it is easily checked [6,16] that the two-center singlet state | − s,2 12 is the only one such that the effective representation ofV in Eq. (2) vanishes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (2) shows that under RCs, because [Ŝ 2 ,V RC ] = 0,Ŝ 2 is a constant of motion. Here, we indicate with | − s,N the singlet state of N scattering centers of spin quantum number s. In the case of N = 2 and for an unpolarized spin state of e, it is easily checked [6,16] that the two-center singlet state | − s,2 12 is the only one such that the effective representation ofV in Eq. (2) vanishes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of “flying spins” to manipulate static qubits has been discussed in the past 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 and it has been noted that the reflection matrix [ R ] in equation (2) represents a unitary transformation suitable for quantum operations if the barriers at in Fig. 1(b,c) are large enough to reflect the incident electrons completely 20 21 , which we employ in this proposal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we will first show that (1) all standard single qubit operations can be effected without any magnetic field through interactions of the form with the itinerant or “flying” non-equilibrium spin population while (2) two qubit operations can be implemented through separate interactions of the form and with the flying spin population . The latter process has been discussed earlier by several authors 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 and we draw on this work, but there is a key distinction with the present work as explained in the next section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although this asymmetry does not eliminate all the resonant effects, it restricts the constructive quantum interference [34]. It also affects the indistinguishability of the Feynmann paths of the scattered electron, decreasing the level of entanglement created [26,25]. Because our main aim is to analyse the effect of electric field and the sake of clarity, we consider the impurities initial spin state as always parallel.…”
Section: A Two-impurity Scattering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with similar expression for C R , in the case when a reflected electron is detected with its spin changed. in an electron scattering process [25,41]. Is important to note that the magnitude of the spins interactions will depend on the ratio between the coupling factor J and the kinetic energy .…”
Section: Spin and Charge Detection Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%