1992
DOI: 10.1016/0042-207x(92)90148-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron energy distribution function in a dc magnetron sputtering discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plasma density n e was calculated using the electron temperature and the ion saturation current. For these calculations we assumed a Maxwellian electron energy distribution function (EEDF), which has been shown to be valid in DCMS for total gas pressures above ∼1 Pa [22]. The recorded EEDF:s for the different discharges support this assumption.…”
Section: The Transient Calorimetric Probementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The plasma density n e was calculated using the electron temperature and the ion saturation current. For these calculations we assumed a Maxwellian electron energy distribution function (EEDF), which has been shown to be valid in DCMS for total gas pressures above ∼1 Pa [22]. The recorded EEDF:s for the different discharges support this assumption.…”
Section: The Transient Calorimetric Probementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, and due to the higher cross section for electron impact ionization over electron impact dissociation (Mao et al 2008), chemical reactions involving cations such as C 2 + H 2 and C 2 H + might take place. However, the electron temperature of the plasma in magnetron sputtering discharges and in SGASs is lower than 10 eV (Ivanov et al 1992;Kousal et al 2017), which favors electron impact dissociation over direct ionization or dissociative ionization events. This is different to the case of dusty plasmas in which apart from the neutral dissociative production of C 2 H, there is a higher probability for the formation of C 2 + H 2 (from C 2 H 2 ) and C 2 H + (from C 2 H) by electron knocking-off and dissociative ionization processes, respectively.…”
Section: Formation Of Polyacetylenic Chains (C 2n H 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the electron temperature of the plasma in magnetron sputtering discharges and in SGAS sources is lower than 10 eV (Ivanov et al 1992;Kousal et al 2017), which favours electron impact dissociation over direct ionization or dissociative ionization events. This is different to the case of dusty plasmas in which apart from the neutral dissociative production of C 2 H, there is a higher probability for the formation of C 2 H + 2 (from C 2 H 2 ) and C 2 H + (from C 2 H) by electron-knocking off and dissociative ionization processes, respectively.…”
Section: Composition Of the Dust Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%