2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.64.115420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron diffraction study of one-dimensional crystals of fullerenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

26
188
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
26
188
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, we found 0.7-0.8 nm separation for some C 59 N-der pairs (indicated by arrows in Fig. 2) in contrast to the ∼ 1 nm separation that is observed for encapsulated C 60 peapods [1,19]. Although the data does not allow to determine the precise configuration of the C 59 N-der pairs, neither gives an accurate measure of their separation, it might be attributed to the presence of the strongly polar side-group of C 59 N-der.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Interestingly, we found 0.7-0.8 nm separation for some C 59 N-der pairs (indicated by arrows in Fig. 2) in contrast to the ∼ 1 nm separation that is observed for encapsulated C 60 peapods [1,19]. Although the data does not allow to determine the precise configuration of the C 59 N-der pairs, neither gives an accurate measure of their separation, it might be attributed to the presence of the strongly polar side-group of C 59 N-der.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…4C. It is important to notice that the hexagon radial modes H g (3) and H g (4) show specific fingerprint changes after dimerization, such that the original lines split into lines at 710 ϩ 725 cm Ϫ1 and 754 ϩ 771 ϩ 779 cm Ϫ1 , respectively, due to formation of covalent bonds between C 60 molecules (arrows). This feature has not been observed in monomeric peapods but is in good agreement with the split in bulk C 60 dimers except for the line at 725 cm Ϫ1 , which might be derived from the H g (3) mode, and changed due to interaction between C 60 and SWNT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such nanostructures are emerging as a class of nanoscale materials with tunable mechanical, electronic, thermal, and optical properties (2,3). In contrast to bulk C 60 crystals, C 60 inserted in SWNTs form monomeric linear chains in which each C 60 has only two nearest neighbors, as compared to 12 neighbors in crystalline bulk C 60 (4). As a result the intermolecular interactions in these self-assembled carbon nanostructures and the dynamic behavior of the encapsulated molecules are expected to be different from those in solid fullerenes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to metal atoms, fullerenes have also been encapsulated inside single walled carbon nanotubes. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] High-resolution transmission electron microscopy ͑HR-TEM͒ images clearly show the encapsulations of various fullerenes, e.g., C 60 , C 70 , C 80 , and C 84 , as well as metallofullerenes, e.g., Gd@ C 82 and Sc 2 @C 84 inside single-walled nanotubes. These unusual structures occasionally called carbon peapods, can be classified as a new class of crystalline carbon with novel structural hierarchy: The structure of the peapods is characterized by an interesting combination of one-and zero-dimensional constituent units, i.e., carbon nanotubes and fullerenes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%