2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2007.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron conductivity and density profiles derived from the mutual impedance probe measurements performed during the descent of Huygens through the atmosphere of Titan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of this total ionization, presented in Fig. 4, shows that the GCR ionize mainly at an altitude of 65 km, which is consistent with Huygens observations (López-Moreno et al 2008;Hamelin et al 2007) as shown in Paper I. The main ion produced is N + 2 , followed by CH + 4 , CH + 3 , and N + .…”
Section: The Cosmic-ray Total Ion Productionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result of this total ionization, presented in Fig. 4, shows that the GCR ionize mainly at an altitude of 65 km, which is consistent with Huygens observations (López-Moreno et al 2008;Hamelin et al 2007) as shown in Paper I. The main ion produced is N + 2 , followed by CH + 4 , CH + 3 , and N + .…”
Section: The Cosmic-ray Total Ion Productionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The remaining presence of that gap ensures that there are still two separate layers of ionization caused by cosmic rays and Saturn's protons, which is consistent with our previous conclusions. The cosmic ray ionization peak, at 65 km altitude, agrees with the Huygens data, which indicates that an ion layer peaks at this altitude (Paper I; López-Moreno et al 2008;Hamelin et al 2007, and references herein). The second difference is the altitude and the intensity of the peak due to electron precipitation at an altitude of 900 km, to account for the influence of magnetic field lines, explained in Paper II (Gronoff et al 2009b), we assumed a dip angle of 20 • for the electron precipitation.…”
Section: Revised Evaluation Of the Total Ionization Profilesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…These authors concluded that in order to explain the observed disk emissions, the scattered stellar light from Titan's disk is the most likely scenario. It is worth mentioning, however, that according to Gronoff et al (2011), the ionization by each Z-group of cosmic rays in the atmosphere of Titan results in the formation of an ionization layer peaking at 65 km altitude, independently of the solar activity, in consistency with the Huygens measurements (Hamelin et al 2007;López-Moreno et al 2008). The observed correlation between cosmic ray ionization altitudes and aerosol layers urges for further investigations in this direction in the future.…”
Section: The Role Of Galactic Cosmic Rays and Transient Eventssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Each source has a main ionization altitude that creates several ionospheric layers above 50 km (Hamelin et al 2007;Cravens et al 2008Cravens et al , 2009López-Moreno et al 2008, and references therein). The ion production rates in Titan's ionosphere, for the dayside (Richard et al 2015a and references therein) and nightside (Richard et al 2015b and references therein), have been extensively studied.…”
Section: Space Weather At the Saturnian Moonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each source has a main ionization altitude that creates several ionosphere layers above 50 km (Cravens et al 2008(Cravens et al , 2009Hamelin et al 2007;López-Moreno et al 2008, and references therein). While Titan can be inside or outside of the Saturn's magnetosphere, particle precipitation, hence ionization can be very variable depending on the position of the satellite and local plasma conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%