2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00768-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron beam tomography comparison of culprit and non-culprit coronary arteries in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most patients presenting with an acute ischemic event have detectable CAC [26,27]. In some of these studies, IVUS has demonstrated frequent calcification of the culprit lesion [28][29][30]. The calcifications noted, tend to be small and often show a spotty pattern [30,31].…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most patients presenting with an acute ischemic event have detectable CAC [26,27]. In some of these studies, IVUS has demonstrated frequent calcification of the culprit lesion [28][29][30]. The calcifications noted, tend to be small and often show a spotty pattern [30,31].…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Recent studies have shown detectable coronary calcifications in 95% of patients with acute coronary syndromes. 14 15 However, in younger individuals, coronary events often occur in the presence of early stages of coronary artery disease, presumably caused by the rupture of lipid-rich coronary plaques, [16][17][18] and coronary calcification may be less prevalent than in older patients with acute myocardial infarction. 19 The value of electron beam tomography in detecting relatively young patients at risk of acute myocardial infarction is therefore less clear and has so far not been investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%