2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp41947e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron and nuclear spin dynamics in the thermal mixing model of dynamic nuclear polarization

Abstract: A novel mathematical treatment is proposed for computing the time evolution of dynamic nuclear polarization processes in the low temperature thermal mixing regime. Without assuming any a priori analytical form for the electron polarization, our approach provides a quantitative picture of the steady state that agrees with the well known Borghini prediction based on thermodynamic arguments, as long as the electrons-nuclei transition rates are fast compared to the other relevant time scales. Substantially differe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a speed up of the DNP process with the increase in the radical concentration has to be expected, since there are more polarization transfer centers, the significant decrease of the steady state polarization has not been accounted for by any previous theoretical description of TM-DNP. In fact both the Borghini [22] and the finite contact model introduced in [12] and [13] predict no effect of the radical concentration as long as T 1n is negligible whereas, in presence of leakage, a higher number of polarizing centres would push the system towards higher steady state polarizations. Gadolinium doping on the other hand leaves substantially unaffected the nuclear polarization time, while shortening the typical electron spin lattice relaxation time T 1e .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While a speed up of the DNP process with the increase in the radical concentration has to be expected, since there are more polarization transfer centers, the significant decrease of the steady state polarization has not been accounted for by any previous theoretical description of TM-DNP. In fact both the Borghini [22] and the finite contact model introduced in [12] and [13] predict no effect of the radical concentration as long as T 1n is negligible whereas, in presence of leakage, a higher number of polarizing centres would push the system towards higher steady state polarizations. Gadolinium doping on the other hand leaves substantially unaffected the nuclear polarization time, while shortening the typical electron spin lattice relaxation time T 1e .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by these three items we introduced a novel model, based on the same rate equations approach proposed in [12] under the assumption of bad electronnucleus contact and negligible nuclear leakage, but including an additional mechanism accounting for energy exchanges between couples of electron spins (that flip simultaneusly) and the lattice. It is worth to mention that similar flip-flop processes were already introduced by Farrar et al [27] in a high temperature approximation of TM-DNP in presence of inhomogeneusly broadened ESR lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of relevant parameters, including the radical concentration [14][15][16], the concentration of gadolinium complexes [14,17], the nuclear concentration [18,19], the amount of matrix deuteration [20], the effect of microwave saturation and the field strength [15,16,21] on the DNP performances of this molecule have been experimentally studied. Remarkably very recently, the relevance of these physical quantities on DNP kinetics has also been considered in the development of novel models describing TM throughout a rate equation approach [19,22,23]. Nevertheless, the role of the properties of the glassy matrix formed by the polarized molecules and radicals has not been investigated to a deep level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%