2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab7986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron and muon (g − 2) in the B-LSSM

Abstract: The theoretical predictions in the standard model (SM) and measurements on the anomalous magnetic dipole moments (MDM) of muon and electron have great precision, hence the MDMs of muon and electron have close relation with the new physics (NP) beyond the SM. Recently, a negative ∼ 2.4σ discrepancy between the measured electron MDM and the SM prediction results from a recent improved determination of the fine structure constant. Combined with the longlasting muon MDM discrepancy which is about ∼ 3.7σ, it is dif… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed pattern for ∆a e and ∆a µ further suggests the underlying presence of New Physics (NP) potentially violating the universality of lepton flavours. Several attempts have been recently conducted to simultaneously explain the tensions in both ∆a e,µ (see for example [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117]): in particular, certain scenarios have explored a chiral enhancement, due to heavy vector-like leptons in the one-loop dipole operator, which can potentially lead to sizeable contributions for the leptonic magnetic moments; however, this can open the door to charged lepton flavour violating interactions (new physics fields with non-trivial couplings to both muons and electrons can potentially lead to sizeable rates for µ → eγ, µ → 3e and µ − e conversion), already in conflict with current data [118]. Controlled couplings of electrons and muons to beyond the Standard Model (BSM) fields in the loop (subject to "generation-wise" mixing between SM and heavy vector-like fields) can be achieved, and this further allows to evade the potentially very stringent constraints from charged lepton flavour violating (cLFV) µ − e transitions.…”
Section: Jhep07(2020)235mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed pattern for ∆a e and ∆a µ further suggests the underlying presence of New Physics (NP) potentially violating the universality of lepton flavours. Several attempts have been recently conducted to simultaneously explain the tensions in both ∆a e,µ (see for example [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117]): in particular, certain scenarios have explored a chiral enhancement, due to heavy vector-like leptons in the one-loop dipole operator, which can potentially lead to sizeable contributions for the leptonic magnetic moments; however, this can open the door to charged lepton flavour violating interactions (new physics fields with non-trivial couplings to both muons and electrons can potentially lead to sizeable rates for µ → eγ, µ → 3e and µ − e conversion), already in conflict with current data [118]. Controlled couplings of electrons and muons to beyond the Standard Model (BSM) fields in the loop (subject to "generation-wise" mixing between SM and heavy vector-like fields) can be achieved, and this further allows to evade the potentially very stringent constraints from charged lepton flavour violating (cLFV) µ − e transitions.…”
Section: Jhep07(2020)235mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this measurement also shows a possible disagreement between the data and theory, with the measured value lower than the SM prediction by JHEP09(2020)119 about 2.4σ [13]. These tantalizing opposite deviations have invited many studies to explore suitable NP models [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tandem, there have also been ample attempts to resolve the matter of electron and muon magnetic moments within a supersymmetric framework [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Considering that the lepton (g − 2) from minimal SUSY sources are also always of the same sign, these proposals utilize the effects of large flavor non-universal A-terms [25][26][27][28][29] or flavorviolating SUSY-breaking terms [30,31]. Notwithstanding the fact that such effects could be challenging to incorporate in a consistent SUSY-breaking mechanism, the former suffer from the possibilities of large fine-tuning in the lepton mass matrix and charge-breaking minima of the scalar potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%