1993
DOI: 10.1002/oms.1210280416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron affinities of naphthalene, anthracene and substituted naphthalenes and anthracenes

Abstract: The determination of electron transfer equilibria A-+ B = A + B-in the gas phase, with a pulsed-electron highpressure mass spectrometer, leads to AGIO, AH,', and ASlo values. These can be converted into the free energy, enthalpy and entropy changes, AGC(B), AH,O(B) and AS,O(B), for the reaction e + B = B-, since the correspond-ing values for the reference compounds A are known. Results were obtained for 18 substituted aaphthaleues, anthracene and substituted anthracenes. The results are compared with some theo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous ε LUMO /mutagenic activity QSARs studies often employed ε LUMO values obtained at semiempirical levels [11,51,52], which for some cases gave inadequate EA estimations. In fact, for the prototypical nitronaphthalene (NN) isomers, AM1 ε LUMO values were calculated to be −1.266 and −1.415 eV for 1-NN and 2-NN isomers, respectively, [11], in disagreement with the observed EA values of 1.23 and 1.18 eV, respectively [53]. In addition, for the different mutagenic 3-NBaP and 6-NBaP isomers, AM1 predicts almost similar ε LUMO values of −1.766 and −1.767 eV, respectively [11], in disagreement with recent B3LYP/6-31+G* SCF computations which give EA values of 1.55 and 1.34 eV, respectively [54].…”
Section: Ionization Potential and Electron Affinitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Previous ε LUMO /mutagenic activity QSARs studies often employed ε LUMO values obtained at semiempirical levels [11,51,52], which for some cases gave inadequate EA estimations. In fact, for the prototypical nitronaphthalene (NN) isomers, AM1 ε LUMO values were calculated to be −1.266 and −1.415 eV for 1-NN and 2-NN isomers, respectively, [11], in disagreement with the observed EA values of 1.23 and 1.18 eV, respectively [53]. In addition, for the different mutagenic 3-NBaP and 6-NBaP isomers, AM1 predicts almost similar ε LUMO values of −1.766 and −1.767 eV, respectively [11], in disagreement with recent B3LYP/6-31+G* SCF computations which give EA values of 1.55 and 1.34 eV, respectively [54].…”
Section: Ionization Potential and Electron Affinitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These results were later confirmed by photoionization mass spectrometry experiments [15]. In addition, the experimental EA values of 1-NN and 2-NN obtained from temperature dependent equilibrium ion/molecule reaction method [16], are 1.23 and 1.18 eV, respectively. Differently to s NO 2 + C N mode, asymmetric stretches of N O bonds ( as NO 2 ) are strongly mixed with ring stretching ( ring ) and in-plane C H bending (␦CH) motions.…”
Section: Nitronaphtalenesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…two [12] or four [13] times less mutagenic than 2-NN isomer. In addition, experimental values of both first ionization potential (IP) [14,15] and electron affinity (EA) [16] of both NN isomers are close to each other, indicating that oxidations and reductions are not crucial steps for the mutagenic properties of NNs. Alternatively, mutagenic pathways might be ruled by binding between NPAHs and the acitve site of enzymes [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the electron a nity (EA) of naphthalene has negative value, the derivatizations of the naphthalene skeleton by polar or electron-withdrawing functional groups change from negative to positive values in EA. 31,32) In the case of 1,2-ANL, 2,1-ANL and 8,2-ANL, furthermore, a cooperative-e ect owing to the presence of relatively adjacent functional groups of -OH and -NH 3 having non-bonding electrons may increase in the electron a nity due to the electron-withdrawing effect.…”
Section: Ev) E Generation Of Deprotonated Matrix [M−h]mentioning
confidence: 99%