2022
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2020.3041618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromyography-Based Gesture Recognition: Is It Time to Change Focus From the Forearm to the Wrist?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
82
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although only four sensors were used in that previous study, their location was consistent with our electrode placement below the head of the ulna. In contrast, Botros et al (16) reported higher accuracies (~88%) for offline single and combined finger prediction using the same feature set, but their electrodes targeted the muscle fibers in the proximal and medial part of the wrist instead of the tendons. The main limitation of the tendon electric signals is their high crosstalk due to the convergence of the muscle tendons in a reduced space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although only four sensors were used in that previous study, their location was consistent with our electrode placement below the head of the ulna. In contrast, Botros et al (16) reported higher accuracies (~88%) for offline single and combined finger prediction using the same feature set, but their electrodes targeted the muscle fibers in the proximal and medial part of the wrist instead of the tendons. The main limitation of the tendon electric signals is their high crosstalk due to the convergence of the muscle tendons in a reduced space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results obtained without decoding the neural activity were consistent with those reported in previous studies (15) and indicate poor classification performance. Conversely, the proposed neural decoding allowed for >95% accuracy over ten finger tasks at multiple force levels, which was substantially greater than without decoding the tendon signals as well as than conventional EMG-based interfaces (16,17,41).…”
Section: User Intent Prediction (Offline)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the most common methods of FGR are visual-based, voice-based, and surface electromyography (EMG)-based ones. Among them, surface EMG is the comprehensive photoelectrical signal of potential muscle action on the surface of the skin ( Botros et al, 2020 ). It is a kind of non-stationary signal, and its strength is sensitively proportional to the degree of muscle activity, which makes it can accurately represent the gesture of fingers ( Botros et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, surface EMG is the comprehensive photoelectrical signal of potential muscle action on the surface of the skin ( Botros et al, 2020 ). It is a kind of non-stationary signal, and its strength is sensitively proportional to the degree of muscle activity, which makes it can accurately represent the gesture of fingers ( Botros et al, 2020 ). Therefore, surface EMG-based is widely adopted to achieve FGR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%