2010
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.90539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromyographic Measurement of Eating Behaviors for Buckwheat Noodles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Kohyama et al . ). They were also asked to press a button when they started chewing and finished swallowing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Kohyama et al . ). They were also asked to press a button when they started chewing and finished swallowing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding the command of oral strategy, Mioche et al (1999) reported that free style mastication required less muscle activity than side-imposed mastication, and Kohyama et al (2010) reported that normal chewing of buckwheat noodles required less muscle work than slurping, thus, free mastication would be recorded as the most effective mastication. The serving size and amount, the serving order of test samples, the command of oral strategy, and so on should be based on the experimental design.…”
Section: Experimental Conditions Of Emgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models predict rumen pH from 'physically effective fibre' intake, and implicit in these predictions, is the assumption that 'physically effective fibre' promotes chewing, and in turn chewing promotes salivation, which elevates rumen pH. This linkage is also confirmed by data obtained in humans where the ingestion of a diet of firm texture is accompanied by high amplitudes of masseter muscle activity together with a high salivary secretion during the chewing process (de Muñ iz et al, 1983;Kohyama et al, 2010). 2 min of intake 10 min of intake 2 min of intake 10 min of intake CM 12 h no hay 12 ± 1.6 a 76 ± 11 a (79 ± 8.9) 6.0 ± 1.5 a 5.9 ± 1.5 a 0.15 ± 0.02 a 0.16 ± 0.01 a CM after RH 12 ± 1.6 a 84 ± 10 a (79 ± 11) 5.8 ± 1.9 a 4.4 ± 1.6 a 0.17 ± 0.01 a 0.18 ± 0.02 a CM after AH 18 ± 6.2 b 67 ± 18 a (66 ± 14) 4.9 ± 1.5 a 4.7 ± 1.6 a 0.23 ± 0.02 b 0.24 ± 0.01 b Means in the same column with unlike superscripts are different with p < 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These models predict rumen pH from ‘physically effective fibre’ intake, and implicit in these predictions, is the assumption that ‘physically effective fibre’ promotes chewing, and in turn chewing promotes salivation, which elevates rumen pH. This linkage is also confirmed by data obtained in humans where the ingestion of a diet of firm texture is accompanied by high amplitudes of masseter muscle activity together with a high salivary secretion during the chewing process (de Muñiz et al., 1983; Kohyama et al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%