2003
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.68.036301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromotive force and large-scale magnetic dynamo in a turbulent flow with a mean shear

Abstract: An effect of sheared large-scale motions on a mean electromotive force in a nonrotating turbulent flow of a conducting fluid is studied. It is demonstrated that in a homogeneous divergence-free turbulent flow the α-effect does not exist, however a mean magnetic field can be generated even in a nonrotating turbulence with an imposed mean velocity shear due to a new "shear-current" effect. A mean velocity shear results in an anisotropy of turbulent magnetic diffusion. A contribution to the electromotive force re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
151
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
151
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of this "W × J-effect" has been confirmed in the framework of the second-order correlation approximation by Rädler and Stepanov (2006). The simple model of an "W × J-dynamo" proposed by Rogachevskii and Kleeorin (2003) (see also Rogachevskii and Kleeorin 2004) works with the coefficients determining this and the accompanying effects as calculated in the spectral τ -approximation. It turned out however that it fails to work with the coefficients resulting from the second-order correlation approximation for purely hydrodynamic background turbulence, and this applies independently of q Kitchatinov 2006, Rädler andStepanov 2006).…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The existence of this "W × J-effect" has been confirmed in the framework of the second-order correlation approximation by Rädler and Stepanov (2006). The simple model of an "W × J-dynamo" proposed by Rogachevskii and Kleeorin (2003) (see also Rogachevskii and Kleeorin 2004) works with the coefficients determining this and the accompanying effects as calculated in the spectral τ -approximation. It turned out however that it fails to work with the coefficients resulting from the second-order correlation approximation for purely hydrodynamic background turbulence, and this applies independently of q Kitchatinov 2006, Rädler andStepanov 2006).…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Another suggestion is that, if even transient growth makes non axisymmetric mean magnetic fields strong enough, they themselves might drive motions which could lead to subcritical dynamo action (Rincon et al 2008). Yet another possibility that has been suggested is the shear-current effect (Rogachevskii & Kleeorin 2003, 2004. In this mechanism, it is thought that the mean shear gives rise to anisotropic turbulence, which causes an extra component of the mean electromotive force (EMF), leading to the generation of the cross-shear component of the mean magnetic field from the component parallel to the shear flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was one of the first examples showing cyclic dynamo action somewhat reminiscent of the solar dynamo , and it was believed to be a prototype of magnetically driven dynamos ( ). This phenomenon may be superficially similar to a magnetically dominated version of the shear-current effect (Rogachevskii & Kleeorin 2003. With the test-field method one is now in a good position to identify the governing mechanism by determining all components of the α and η t tensors.…”
Section: Dynamos Driven By Magnetic Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%