2011
DOI: 10.1177/1045389x11398164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromechanical Modeling of the Low-Frequency Zigzag Micro-Energy Harvester

Abstract: An analytical electromechanical model is proposed to predict the deflection, voltage, and the power output of a proposed low-frequency micro-harvesting structure. The high natural frequencies of the existing designs of micro-scale vibrational energy harvesters are serious drawbacks. A zigzag design is proposed to overcome this limitation. First, the natural frequencies and the mode shapes of the zigzag structure are calculated. The piezoelectric direct and reverse effect equations, together with the electrical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elastic layer is formed of a thick-film photoresist and has a 3D meshed-core structure to lower resonance frequency, as shown in Figure 1. The conventional studies to lower resonance frequency use the methods as follows: (1) low Young’s modulus of polymer materials [7], (2) heavy weight of the proof mass [13], (3) long entire length of the cantilever (from the fixed end to the free end) [8,9,16]. The simplest approach is to use heavy proof mass; however, the mass and volume of the whole device will easily increase and it is not preferable for practical applications.
10.1080/14686996.2018.1508985-F0001Figure 1.Schematic of the proposed PVEH with 3D meshed-core structure (10 mm × 21 mm × 280 μm).
…”
Section: Overall Design Of Pvehmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The elastic layer is formed of a thick-film photoresist and has a 3D meshed-core structure to lower resonance frequency, as shown in Figure 1. The conventional studies to lower resonance frequency use the methods as follows: (1) low Young’s modulus of polymer materials [7], (2) heavy weight of the proof mass [13], (3) long entire length of the cantilever (from the fixed end to the free end) [8,9,16]. The simplest approach is to use heavy proof mass; however, the mass and volume of the whole device will easily increase and it is not preferable for practical applications.
10.1080/14686996.2018.1508985-F0001Figure 1.Schematic of the proposed PVEH with 3D meshed-core structure (10 mm × 21 mm × 280 μm).
…”
Section: Overall Design Of Pvehmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The meshed-core structure can be combined with previously studied structures and shapes such as ‘2D structures (e.g. meandered or spiral structure [9,16])’ for reducing the resonance frequency, and 2D shapes (e.g. trapezoid, triangle [20,21]) for improving power generation.…”
Section: Overall Design Of Pvehmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changing the number and location of piezoelectric patches or layers along the beam can improve coupling and shift the natural frequency of the device (Guyomar et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2009). Multi-beam structures can compact the design by folding it in on itself while retaining a similar natural frequency to the original, straight configuration (Karami & Inman, 2011;Erturk et al, 2009). A nonlinear technique called "frequency up-conversion" also shows promise to boost power at frequencies more than an order of magnitude below resonance (Murray & Rastegar, 2009;Tieck et al, 2006;Wickenheiser & Garcia, 2010b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is derived from the classical transfer matrix method (TMM) for multi-component structures and trusses (Pestel & Leckie, 1963) combined with an existing model for constant cross section, Euler-Bernoulli beam energy harvesters (Wickenheiser & Garcia, 2010c). A variation of this technique is employed by (Karami & Inman, 2011) to find the natural frequencies and mode shapes of a zigzag structure; however, their formulation is specific to 180° bends between segments. The TMM has been shown to reduce to the classical solutions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%