1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00032-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromechanical coupling and synchronous firing of single wrist extensor motor units in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of intergroup difference in the electromechanomyographical and electromechanical ratios is in contrast to findings by Barry et al, 2 Marusiak et al, 20,21 Orizio et al, 25 and Schmied et al 28 Barry et al and Orizio et al found smaller values for the RMS-MMG/EMG ratio in patients with neuromuscular disorders (Becker muscular dystrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, myotonic muscular dystrophy, congenital myopathy, mild myopathy, and dermatomyositis) compared with control subjects. They explained their results as an effect of FT muscle fiber atrophy and replacement of the fibers with connective tissue, which is stiffer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The lack of intergroup difference in the electromechanomyographical and electromechanical ratios is in contrast to findings by Barry et al, 2 Marusiak et al, 20,21 Orizio et al, 25 and Schmied et al 28 Barry et al and Orizio et al found smaller values for the RMS-MMG/EMG ratio in patients with neuromuscular disorders (Becker muscular dystrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, myotonic muscular dystrophy, congenital myopathy, mild myopathy, and dermatomyositis) compared with control subjects. They explained their results as an effect of FT muscle fiber atrophy and replacement of the fibers with connective tissue, which is stiffer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…For example, motor unit synchronization is lower during index finger flexion compared with abduction (Bremner et al 1991), but is greater during lengthening compared with shortening muscle contractions . These findings are interpreted as a change in the number and/or excitability of branched corticospinal inputs used to perform these tasks (Farmer et al 1990;Schmied et al 1999). However, most measurements of the strength of motor unit synchronization in humans are performed in hand or wrist muscles, which have strong corticospinal projections to motor neurons (Clough et al 1968;Phillips and Porter 1964).…”
Section: Motor Unit Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For voluntary isometric contractions of fresh muscle, the prevailing view is that motor unit synchronization arises from common synaptic input received by motor neurons from either branched last-order interneurons or cortical efferents that receive common input (Datta et al 1991;Farmer et al 1990Farmer et al , 1993bMantel and Lemon 1987;Moritz et al 2005;Schmied et al 1999), but does not seem to be influenced by peripheral afferents (Farmer et al 1993a(Farmer et al , 1997. However, the mechanisms responsible for an increase in motor unit synchronization after eccentric exercise are less clear, because the exerciseinduced muscle damage is likely to cause physiological adjustments within the muscle that influence both the spinal and cortical control of movement.…”
Section: Motor Unit Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some of the few single motor unit studies performed in patients with ALS have not been covered in this review. The interested reader may find additional information in Schmied et al (1999), Attarian et al (2006Attarian et al ( , 2008.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%