2005
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2005026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic propagation features of ground‐penetrating radars for the exploration of Martian subsurface

Abstract: In this work, the effects of magnetic inclusions in a Mars-like soil are considered with reference to the electromagnetic propagation features of ground-penetrating radars (GPRs). Low-frequency and time-domain techniques, using L-C-R meters and TDR instruments, respectively, are implemented in laboratory experimental set-ups in order to evaluate complex permittivity and permeability and wave velocity for different scenarios of a dielectric background medium (silica) with magnetic inclusions (magnetite). Attenu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such an environment, where postreflection waves may be disrupted before returning to the transceiver, larger objects have a better chance of returning a coherent radargram feature. These results augment suggestions that GPR waves in planetary volcanic terrain may suffer composition‐dependent attenuation [ Paillou et al ., ; Heggy et al ., ; Stillman and Olhoeft , ; Williams and Greeley , ; Pettinelli et al ., ] by demonstrating that penetration may be limited at least as severely by near surfaces crowded with structural scatterers. Similar conclusions have been drawn based on poor radar returns at depth recorded from beneath impact‐crater breccia at Haughton impact crater [ Unrau et al ., ], due to fractured bedrock at small impact craters in the Egyptian desert [ Heggy and Paillou , ], and in the heterogeneously welded Bishop Tuff [ Grimm et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such an environment, where postreflection waves may be disrupted before returning to the transceiver, larger objects have a better chance of returning a coherent radargram feature. These results augment suggestions that GPR waves in planetary volcanic terrain may suffer composition‐dependent attenuation [ Paillou et al ., ; Heggy et al ., ; Stillman and Olhoeft , ; Williams and Greeley , ; Pettinelli et al ., ] by demonstrating that penetration may be limited at least as severely by near surfaces crowded with structural scatterers. Similar conclusions have been drawn based on poor radar returns at depth recorded from beneath impact‐crater breccia at Haughton impact crater [ Unrau et al ., ], due to fractured bedrock at small impact craters in the Egyptian desert [ Heggy and Paillou , ], and in the heterogeneously welded Bishop Tuff [ Grimm et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meteor Crater measurements reported here are obtained in a limestone‐ and quartzite‐rich medium with dielectric of 3.5–5.2, which likely increases with depth. Much of planetary surfaces are volcanic basalts in which dielectric could easily be above 7, and iron‐rich materials on Mars could push it up to 15 [ Paillou et al ., ; Olhoeft , ; Heggy et al ., ; Stillman and Olhoeft , ; Williams and Greeley , ; Pettinelli et al ., ], although extremely dry conditions may help to mediate this. Such conditions could restrict penetration depths at these wavelengths to 2–3 m, and in extreme cases down to ~1 m. Due to the highly scattering nature of the Meteor Crater ejecta subsurface, we observed few detections below 3 m and enough to discuss only above 2 m. This limited penetration in ejecta‐ and crater‐related terrain may be expected, and also common on heavily cratered planetary surfaces [e.g., Unrau et al ., ; Heggy and Paillou , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, v is the frequency, and ε, ε and μ, μ are the real and imaginary parts of the relative complex permittivity ε* and permeabilityμ*, respectively. The LCR meter, coupled to a capacitive cell filled with the test material, enables us to measure the complex permittivityε* (Pettinelli et al ). By assuming that the equivalent circuit consists of a capacitor Cp in parallel with a resistor Rp, we have ε=CpC0andε=1ωC0Rp, …”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C0 is the capacitance of the cell in air. Similarly, when the LCR meter is coupled to an inductance Ls (a solenoid embedded in the test material), using the equivalent LsRs series circuit (Pettinelli et al ), we can measure μ=LsL0andμ=RsR0ωL0, …”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capability of reconstructing the correct location, size, shape, and electromagnetic properties of buried targets is relevant to many civil, geophysical, and planetary application areas [ 1]- [ 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%